CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extraction of Micro, Nanocrystalline Cellulose and Textile Fibers from Coffee Waste

Karunakaran, Geyandraprasath, Periyasamy, Aravin Prince, Tehrani, Ali·2023·Journal of Testing and Evaluation
DOI 10.1520/jte20220487
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Because of the environmental footprint of oil-based materials, the demand for bio-based renewable materials is hiked. The usage of agricultural waste to extract cellulose, minimized the dependent of hydrocarbon products which is an added value besides due to overpopulation the productivity is increased, which leads to an increase in agricultural waste that causes environmental pollution. In this work, various cellulosic materials, such as cellulosic textile fibers (CTF), microcrystalline cellulosic fibers, and nanocrystalline cellulosic fibers, were extracted from coffee waste to make them into valuable products. The morphological analysis of extracted cellulose is performed by scanning electron microscopy, and the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was performed to investigate the structure of extracted cellulose, which indicates the crystalline cellulosic components from the extraction process; X-ray diffractometer analysis shows the extracted cellulose was cellulose I and cellulose II. The cellulose that is extracted by ultrasonication with dimethyl sulfoxide has 88 % of cellulose with a crystallinity index of 74.5 %, and the thermal properties of raw coffee husk and extracted cellulose were compared by thermogravimetric analysis. Additionally, the dye uptake of the CTF shows its potential as a bio-adsorbent in the dye removal domain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1520/jte20220487

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 2019, Chapter 11 - Applications of Nanotechnology and Carbon Nanoparticles in Agriculture, 247, 10.1016/B978-0-12-815757-2.00011-5 · DOI
  2. Muthu, 2020, Sustainability in Textile Dyeing: Recent Developments, 37
  3. 2022, Natural Dyeing of Cellulose Fibers Using Syzygium cumini Fruit Extracts and a Bio-mordant: A Step toward Sustainable Dyeing, Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 33, e00472, 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00472 · DOI
  4. 2021, Composting Organic Waste from the Broiler Production Chain: A Perspective for the Circular Economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 329, 129717, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129717 · DOI
  5. 2022, “Conversion of Agricultural Waste to Valuable Carbonaceous Material: Brief Review, Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 1290, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.259 · DOI
  6. 2022, Advances in Solid-State Fermentation for Bioconversion of Agricultural Wastes to Value-Added Products: Opportunities and Challenges, Bioresource Technology, 343, 126065, 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126065 · DOI
  7. 2020, Valorization of Underutilized Waste Biomass from Invasive Species to Produce Biochar for Energy and Other Value-Added Applications, Environmental Research, 186, 109596, 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109596 · DOI
  8. 2021, A Critical Review on the Techniques Used for the Synthesis and Applications of Crystalline Cellulose Derived from Agricultural Wastes and Forest Residues, Carbohydrate Polymers, 273, 118537, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118537 · DOI
  9. 2023, Vibration Signature Analysis of Coffee Beans Processing Machineries, Materials Today: Proceedings, 80, 2432, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.378 · DOI
  10. 2021, Properties of Natural Rubber Reinforced with Nano Cellulose from Pineapple Leaf Agricultural Waste, Materials Today Communications, 28, 102594, 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102594 · DOI
  11. 2021, Nanocellulose and Microcrystalline Cellulose from Agricultural Waste: Review on Isolation and Application as Reinforcement in Polymeric Matrices, Food Hydrocolloids, 118, 106771, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106771 · DOI
  12. 2021, Cellulose Nanocrystals from Agricultural Resources: Extraction and Functionalisation, European Polymer Journal, 160, 110789, 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110789 · DOI
  13. 2020, Future Perspectives of Nanocellulose-Based Membrane for Water Treatment, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 37, 101502, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101502 · DOI
  14. 2012, Sustainable Management of Coffee Industry By-Products and Value Addition—A Review, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66, 45, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2005, Chapter 3 - Options for Environmentally Benign Bleaching, 23, 10.1016/B978-044451724-1/50004-6 · DOI
  16. 2005, Chapter 5 - Chlorine-Free Bleaching of Secondary Fibers, 193, 10.1016/B978-044451724-1/50006-X · DOI
  17. 2018, Extraction of Nano Cellulose Fibers from the Banana Peel and Bract for Production of Acetyl and Lauroyl Cellulose, Carbohydrate Polymers, 201, 329, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.081 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2018, Isolation and Characterisation of Microcrystalline Cellulose and Cellulose Nanocrystals from Coffee Husk and Comparative Study with Rice Husk, Carbohydrate Polymers, 191, 205, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.022 · DOI
  19. 1977, Modified Procedure to Determine Acid-Insoluble Lignin in Wood and Pulp, Tappi, 60, 1
  20. 1969, Semimicro Determination of Cellulose in Biological Materials, Analytical Biochemistry, 32, 420, 10.1016/S0003-2697(69)80009-6 · DOI
  21. 2010, Procedimentos Para Análise Lignocelulósica, Documentos 236
  22. 2017, Extraction and Characterization of New Natural Cellulosic Chloris barbata Fiber, Journal of Natural Fibers, 15, 436, 10.1080/15440478.2017.1349015 · DOI
  23. 2005, On the Determination of Crystallinity and Cellulose Content in Plant Fibres, Cellulose, 12, 563, 10.1007/s10570-005-9001-8 · DOI
  24. 2018, Inkjet Printing and UV-LED Curing of Photochromic Dyes for Functional and Smart Textile Applications, RSC Advances, 8, 28395, 10.1039/C8RA05856C · DOI
  25. 2020, Isolation and Characterization of Micro and Nanocrystalline Cellulose Fibers from the Walnut Shell, Corncob and Sugarcane Bagasse, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 163, 1375, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.239 · DOI
  26. 2011, Effect of Pre-acid-hydrolysis Treatment on Morphology and Properties of Cellulose Nanowhiskers from Coconut Husk, Cellulose, 18, 443, 10.1007/s10570-010-9480-0 · DOI
  27. 2016, Effect of Oligosaccharide Deposition on the Surface of Cellulose Nanocrystals as a Function of Acid Hydrolysis Temperature, Cellulose, 23, 3555, 10.1007/s10570-016-1036-5 · DOI
  28. 2022, Ultrasound in Cellulose-Based Hydrogel for Biomedical Use: From Extraction to Preparation, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 212, 112368, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112368 · DOI
  29. 2021, Hybrid Nanocelluloses Isolated through Electron-Beam Irradiation in the Wet State: Redispersibility in Water and Superstability for Pickering Emulsions, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9, 3464, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07451 · DOI
  30. 2019, Extraction of Cellulose Nano-whiskers Using Ionic Liquid-Assisted Ultra-Sonication: Optimization and Mathematical Modelling Using Box–Behnken Design, Symmetry, 11, 1148, 10.3390/sym11091148 · DOI
  31. 2020, Ultrasound Assisted Synthesis of Starch Nanocrystals and It’s Applications with Polyurethane for Packaging Film, Journal of Renewable Materials, 8, 239, 10.32604/jrm.2020.08449 · DOI
  32. 2020, Energy Efficient Process for Valorization of Corn Cob as a Source for Nanocrystalline Cellulose and Hemicellulose Production, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 163, 260, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.276 · DOI
  33. 2019, Structural Characterization of Hemicellulose Released from Corn Cob in Continuous Flow Type Hydrothermal Reactor, Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 127, 222, 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.07.016 · DOI
  34. 2021, Extraction of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Fabrication of High Alumina Refractory Bricks Using Pencil Chips as a Waste Biomass Source, Ceramics International, 47, 27042, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.117 · DOI
  35. 2011, Extraction of Nanocellulose Fibrils from Lignocellulosic Fibres: A Novel Approach, Carbohydrate Polymers, 86, 1468, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.034 · DOI
  36. Horton, 2010, Structure and Engineering of Celluloses, 25
  37. 2016, Production of New Cellulose Nanomaterial from Red Algae Marine Biomass Gelidium elegans, Carbohydrate Polymers, 151, 1210, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.083 · DOI
  38. 1990, An X-ray Study of Regain-Dependent Deformations in Cotton Crystallites, The Journal of the Textile Institute, 81, 241, 10.1080/00405009008658707 · DOI
  39. 2011, Crystal Transition from Cellulose I to Cellulose II in NaOH Treated Agave americana L. Fibre, Carbohydrate Polymers, 86, 1221, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.037 · DOI
  40. 2015, Extraction of Cellulose Nanocrystals from Plant Sources for Application as Reinforcing Agent in Polymers, Composites Part B: Engineering, 75, 176, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.008 · DOI
  41. 2023, Evaluation to Possibility of Cellulose Fibers Isolated from Kapok Randu (Ceiba pentandra) as a Precursor Growth of Carbon Micro Structures with the Assist of Metal Catalysts, Journal of King Saud University – Science, 35, 102423, 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102423 · DOI
  42. 2020, Understanding the Torrefaction of Woody and Agricultural Biomasses through Their Extracted Macromolecular Components. Part 1: Experimental Thermogravimetric Solid Mass Loss, Energy, 205, 118067, 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118067 · DOI
  43. 2013, 15 - Process Control in Finishing of Textiles, 363, 10.1533/9780857095633.3.363 · DOI
  44. 2017, Cellulose Nanocrystal-Reinforced Keratin Bioadsorbent for Effective Removal of Dyes from Aqueous Solution, Bioresource Technology, 232, 254, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.070 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Karunakaran, G., Periyasamy, A. P., & Tehrani, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Chemistry and Technology 1 , A, Technická 5, Dejvice, Praha 6 166 28 ,
  • Department Fiber Web process, VTT Technical Research Center of Finland 2 , Espoo 02150 ,
  • School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University 3 , Vuorimiehentie 1, Espoo 02150 ,
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Publisher
ASTM International
Published
2023-03-06
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
3042-3056
ISSN
  • 0090-3973
  • 1945-7553
DOI
10.1520/jte20220487
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review