The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment
Abstract
Description: 28 papers in this state-of-the-art publication present regulatory concerns, basic research, risk and hazard assessment, and methods development in environmental toxicology. Sections include: • Ecological Risk Assessment Under TSCA • Evaluating Ecological Impacts at the Population and Community Levels • Biomarkers • Marine Toxicity Test Methods • Methods Development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Camargo, J. A., & Alonso, Á. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,248
Fluorinated organics in the biosphere
Key, B. D., Howell, R. D., & Criddle, C. S. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es961007c · Cited by 729
Induction of cytochrome P450 as a biomarker for environmental contamination in aquatic ecosystems
Bucheli, T. D., & Fent, K. (1995) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389509388479 · Cited by 503
Huang, X.-D., El-Alawi, Y., Gurska, J., Glick, B. R., & Greenberg, B. M. (2005) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2005.01.009 · Cited by 286
Wells, J. B., Little, E. E., & Calfee, R. D. (2004) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/02-635 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Landis, W., Hughes, J., & Lewis, M.
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W1591729024
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1520/stp1179-eb
- The paper
- Landis, W., Hughes, J., & Lewis, M. (1993). Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp1179-eb
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
