The Role of Intimacy in Interpersonal Relations
Abstract
Many theories and studies of intimacy exist, yet researchers generally overlook an elementary question: Why should intimacy, in comparison to other features of good relationships, be important for human welfare? This paper addresses two aspects of this question. First, it selectively examines existing theories and research that help indicate why intimacy is so critical for relationship development and individual welfare. Second, it proposes a process-oriented view of social support that focuses on its relation to intimacy. Although functional theories of support are securely ensconced in the literature, there has been little integration of this work with established theories of relationship dynamics. Notions of intimacy suggest several possibilities for such integration, which are explored from theoretical, empirical, and clinical perspectives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A romantic partner's validation may strengthen intimacy, which is associated with benefits like greater positive affect and better psychological well-being.
“Furthermore, validation from a romantic partner may enhance relationship intimacy, which is related to several positive benefits (e.g. increased positive affect, improved psychological well-being) [10; 11].”
From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245 · see citing works
The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
The Compensatory Consumer Behavior Model: How self‐discrepancies drive consumer behavior
Mandel, N., Rucker, D. D., Levav, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.003 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context
Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2010) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)42004-3 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Self-citationValidating pain communication: current state of the science
Edmond, S. N., & Keefe, F. J. (2015) · Pain · doi:10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460301.18207.c2 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Wagner, J., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000052 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reis, H. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reis, Harry T.
- ORCID
- Reis, Harry T.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-30
- ISSN
- 0736-7236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992589712
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- intimacy, interpersonal relationships, social support, relationship building, individual welfare, relational dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review