Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived Racism and Negative Affect: Analyses of Trait and State Measures of Affect in a Community Sample

Open access
Brondolo, Elizabeth, Brady, Nisha, Thompson, Shola, Tobin, Jonathan N., Cassells, Andrea, Sweeney, Monica, Mcfarlane, Delano, Contrada, Richard J.·2008·Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.2.150
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Racism is a significant psychosocial stressor that is hypothesized to have negative psychological and physical health consequences. The Reserve Capacity Model (Gallo & Matthews, 2003) suggests that low socioeconomic status may influence health through its effects on negative affect. We extend this model to study the effects of racism, examining the association of lifetime perceived racism to trait and daily negative affect. A multiethnic sample of 362 American-born Black and Latino adults completed the Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version (PEDQ-CV). Trait negative affect was assessed with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), and state negative affect was measured using ecological momentary assessments (EMA), in the form of an electronic diary. Analyses revealed a significant relationship of lifetime perceived racism to both daily negative affect and trait negative affect, even when controlling for trait hostility and socioeconomic status. The relationship of perceived racism to negative affect was moderated by education, such that the relationships were strongest for those with less than a high school education. The findings support aspects of the Reserve Capacity Model and identify pathways through which perceived racism may affect health status.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.2.150

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Brondolo, E., Brady, N., Thompson, S., Tobin, J. N., Cassells, A., Sweeney, M., Mcfarlane, D., & Contrada, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Guilford Publications
Published
2008-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
150-173
ISSN
0736-7236 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1521/jscp.2008.27.2.150
OpenAlex
W1966196094
Cited by
191
References
8
FWCI
25.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceived Racism and Negative Affect: Analyses of Trait and State Measures of Affect in a Community Sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.2.150
The paper
Brondolo, E., Brady, N., Thompson, S., Tobin, J. N., Cassells, A., Sweeney, M., Mcfarlane, D., & Contrada, R. J. (2008). Perceived Racism and Negative Affect: Analyses of Trait and State Measures of Affect in a Community Sample. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.2.150

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.