The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Media Images on Men's Body-image Concerns
Abstract
Two meta-analyses were conducted to determine the extent to which pressure from the mass media to conform to the muscular “ideal” male body affects men's self-images (i.e., body satisfaction, body esteem, and self-esteem). A total of 25 studies contributing 93 effect sizes were included in two meta-analyses, which revealed that pressure from the mass media was significantly related to men feeling worse about their own bodies. The effect size from the meta-analysis of the correlational studies (Study 1) was significantly negative, d = −0.19, p < .001. The effect size from the meta-analysis of the experimental studies (Study 2) was also significantly negative, d = −0.22, p < .0001. Results from both Study 1 and Study 2 suggest that as men felt pressure from the mass media (in correlational and experimental designs) they felt worse about their bodies. Results showed that pressure from the mass media was related to body satisfaction, body esteem, self-esteem, psychological disorders (e.g., depression), and behavioral outcomes (e.g., excessive exercising).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,395
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x · Cited by 5,531 · cited 4×
“Objectification Theory ( Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997 ) posits that women will have a negative self–image after viewing thin female models.”
BackgroundInfluentialMeta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Parametric measures of effect size.
Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Cited by 1,847
Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59 · Cited by 1,780
Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.10005 · Cited by 1,772
Writing meta-analytic reviews.
Rosenthal, R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.183 · Cited by 1,108
A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot.
Abelson, R. P. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129 · Cited by 1,045
Cited by
Social Media and Body Image Concerns: Current Research and Future Directions
Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. R. (2016) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005 · Cited by 801
‘Strong is the new skinny’: A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram
Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2018) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105316639436 · Cited by 594
A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and body image disturbance
Saiphoo, A. N., & Vahedi, Z. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.028 · Cited by 539
Media effects: theory and research
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Walther, J. B. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608 · Cited by 536
Tylka, T. L. (2011) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.04.008 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Barlett, C. P., Vowels, C. L., & Saucier, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-310
- ISSN
- 0736-7236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141650783
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Media Images on Men's Body-image Concerns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.3.279
- The paper
- Barlett, C. P., Vowels, C. L., & Saucier, D. A. (2008). Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Media Images on Men's Body-image Concerns. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.3.279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
