Cited by 1,045Sports Analytics and PerformanceSport Psychology and PerformanceStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot.

Abelson, Robert P.·1985·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Concerning a single major league at bat, the percentage of variance in batting performance attributable to skill differentials among major league baseball players can be calculated statistically. The statistically appropriate calculation is seriously discrepant with intuitions about the influence of skill in batting performance. This paradoxical discrepancy is discussed in terms of habits of thought about the concept of variance explanation. It is argued that percent variance explanation is a misleading index of the influence of systematic factors in cases where there are processes by which individually tiny influences cumulate to produce meaningful outcomes. It is generally accepted that percentage of variance explained is a good measure of the importance of potential explanatory factors. Correlation coefficients of.30 or less are often poor-mouthed as accounting for less than 10 % of the variance, a rather feeble performance for the influence of a putatively systematic factor. In analysis of variance contexts, the percentage of variance explanation is embodied in the omega-squared ratio of the systematic variance component to the total of the systematic and chance variance components. It, too, is often small; when it is, this is a source of discouragement for the thoughtful investigator. Psychologists sometimes tend to rely too much on statistical significance tests as the basis for making substantive claims, thereby often disguising low levels of variance explanation. It is usually an effective criticism when one can highlight the explanatory weakness of an investigator's pet variables in percentage terms. Having been trained, like all of us, in the idiom of variance explanation, I have always Willa Dinwoodie Abelson, Fred Sheffield, Allan Wagner, and Rick Wagner provided helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. I wish also to thank the faculty and graduate students of the Yale University Psychology Department for exposing themselves to potential collective embarrassment by filling out the questionnaire. Requests for reprints should be sent to Robert P.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small but consistent advantage in student test performance will compound into a sizable increase in cumulative GPA.

    “Just as small but consistent advantages in baseball batting averages compound into large differences in success over a season or career, a small but consistent advantage in student test performance will compound into a sizable increase in cumulative GPA”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abelson, R. P.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Abelson, Robert P.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1985-01
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
129-133
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2120197817
Cited by
1,045
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
31.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
explained variance, omega squared, batting performance, skill differentials, baseball, statistical significance tests, analysis of variance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review