Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Re-Authoring Therapeutic Success: Externalizing the Success and Unpacking Marginalized Narratives of Competence

Kahle, Peter A., Robbins, John M.·1998·Journal of Systemic Therapies

Abstract

White (1989) proposes that externalizing the problem mobilizes families against the problem thus opening space for stories of internalized family competency. The authors suggest that externalizing family success serves as a vehicle for conversation with families who find it difficult to personalize their own competencies. The authors discuss how externalizing not only the problem, but externalizing the success a family experiences can be useful in inviting the family to engage in their marginalized narratives of competence. “Unpacking” client meanings and both forms of externalization can work together to help the therapist and family re-author a family's story. A case study is used to demonstrate the author's competency-immersed approach.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/jsyt.1998.17.3.58

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00415.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00371.x · DOI
  3. Goolishian H., 1990, The Family Psychologist, 6, 44
  4. Tomm K., 1989, Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 8, 54, 10.1521/jsst.1989.8.1.54 · DOI
  5. White M., 1989, Dulwich Centre Newsletter. Special Edition, 3
  6. White M., 1991, Dulwich Centre Newsletter, 3, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kahle, P. A., & Robbins, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Systemic Therapies
Published
1998-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
58-69
ISSN
1195-4396
Cited by
8
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review