The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Speaking Two Languages: A Conversation between Narrative Therapy and Scientific Practices
Abstract
This issue intends to highlight a pilot project for further research that will satisfy the requirements of the Shine a Light Narrative Therapy Research Fund and more generally “evidence-based research.” John and Chris detail their thinking and response to such requirements. I hope this is the harbinger of further such studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This has been termed by David Epston as practice-based evidence [108], which is one arm evidence-based practice informed by therapist expertise [109].”
From Paper 1: a systematic synthesis of narrative therapy treatment components for the treatment of eating disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“A dilemma of researching narrative therapy has been outlined by Epston, Stillman & Erbes [109] as: “…science is about generalising broad truths that apply to everyone, while narrative is about elucidating local truths that apply to those who construct them and live them” (p. 77).”
From Paper 1: a systematic synthesis of narrative therapy treatment components for the treatment of eating disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [109]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1002/jts.2490080106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1521/jsyt.2010.29.2.88 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.449 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heywood, L., Conti, J., & Hay, P. (2022) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-022-00635-5 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Epston, D., Stillman, J. R., & Erbes, C. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Systemic Therapies
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-88
- ISSN
- 1195-4396
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
