The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short-Interval Test-Retest Interrater Reliability of the Dutch Version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II)
Abstract
This study examined the short-interval test-retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-II: First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1995) for DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs). The SCID-II was administered to 69 in- and outpatients on two occasions separated by 1 to 6 weeks. The interviews were conducted at three sites by ten raters. Each rater acted as first and as second rater and equal number of times. The test-retest interrater reliability for the presence or absence of any PD was fair to good (kappa = .63) and was higher than values found in previous short-interval test-retest studies with the SCID-II for DSM-III-R. Test-retest reliability coefficients for trait and sumscores were sufficient, except for dependent PD. Values for single criteria were variable, ranging from poor to good agreement. Further large-scale test-retest research is needed to test the interrater reliability of more categorical diagnoses and single traits.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies found adequate to good interrater reliability for SCID-II interviews [47–49].”
Citations
Cites
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders : SCID-I : clinical version : scoresheet
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997) · American Psychiatric Press eBooks · Cited by 3,101
(1997) · American Psychiatric Press eBooks · Cited by 3,056
Diagnosing Personality Disorders
Zimmerman, M. A. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030061006 · Cited by 715
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Part I: Description
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1995.9.2.83 · Cited by 712
Maffei, C., Fossati, A., Agostoni, I., Barraco, A., Bagnato, M., Deborah, D., Namia, C., Novella, L., & Petrachi, M. (1997) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.279 · Cited by 516
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J. B. W., Davies, M., Borus, J. F., Howes, M. J., Kane, J. M., Pope, H. G., & Rounsaville, B. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1995.9.2.92 · Cited by 420
Renneberg, B., Chambless, D. L., Dowdall, D. J., Fauerbach, J. A., & Gracely, E. J. (1992) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1992.6.2.117 · Cited by 82
Arntz, A. R., van Beijsterveldt, B., Hoekstra, R. J., Hofman, A., Eussen, M., & Sallaerts, S. J. M. (1992) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb10326.x · Cited by 80
Self-citationDreessen, L., & Arntz, A. R. (1998) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1998.12.2.138 · Cited by 77
Self-citationFogelson, D. L., Nuechterlein, K. H., Asarnow, R. F., Subotnik, K. L., & Talovic, S. A. (1991) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(91)90008-d · Cited by 55
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Giesen-Bloo, J., van Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P., van Tilburg, W., Dirksen, C., van Asselt, T., Kremers, I., Nadort, M., & Arntz, A. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.649 · Cited by 1,248
Self-citationLobbestael, J., Leurgans, M., & Arntz, A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.693 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationWongpakaran, N., Wongpakaran, T., Wedding, D., & Gwet, K. L. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-61 · Cited by 1,041
“However, some investigators have expressed concerns about the low Kappa values found for some criteria, despite the high percentage of agreement [4-6].”
BackgroundOsório, F. L., Loureiro, S. R., Hallak, J. E. C., Machado‐de‐Sousa, J. P., Ushirohira, J. M., Baes, C. V. W., Apolinario, T. D., Donadon, M. F., Bolsoni, L. M., Guimarães, T., et al. (2019) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.12931 · Cited by 348
Weekers, L. C., Hutsebaut, J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2019) · Personality and Mental Health · doi:10.1002/pmh.1434 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Weertman, A., ArntZ, A., Dreessen, L., Velzen, C. V., & Vertommen, S.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- ORCID
- ArntZ, Arnoud
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Disorders
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 562-567
- ISSN
- 0885-579X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142845236
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- SCID-II, personality disorders, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, DSM-IV, Dutch version, dependent personality disorder, diagnostic agreement, personality traits
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Personality Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
