Cited by 25Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of Transference Interpretations in Dynamically Oriented Individual Psychotherapy for Patients with Personality Disorders

Ogrodniczuk, John S., Piper, William E.·1999·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

The use of transference interpretations in the individual treatment of patients with personality disorders is a controversial issue. Both expressive approaches that stress the importance of transference interpretations and supportive approaches that avoid interpretation of the transference have been advocated by dynamically oriented therapists. Literature is reviewed regarding recommendations for individual psychotherapy and the different views on interpretation of the transference. Available research that has attempted to illuminate the impact of these interventions is also summarized. Although the findings are limited by a number of methodological shortcomings, three implications have emerged. First, a strong therapeutic alliance is imperative for successful exploration of the transference. Second, transference-focused work should be balanced with supportive interventions. Third, the patient's quality of object relations and his or her ability to work within the transference should be considered. However, without further research to guide clinical decision making, clinicians will be left with a confusing array of recommendations and only their intuition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.4.297

Cites

0 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with borderline personality disorder are more likely to discontinue early in analytic therapy.

    “According to Ogrodniczuk and Piper [19], patients with borderline personality disorder are more likely to discontinue early in analytic therapy.”

Citations

Cites

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Di agnostic and statistical manual ofmental

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 1 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ogrodniczuk, J. S., & Piper, W. E.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
1999-12
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
297-311
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052196148
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
transference interpretation, personality disorders, individual psychotherapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy, therapeutic relationship, support measures, object relations
MeSH terms
Humans, Object Attachment, Personality Disorders, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Psychological Theory, Psychotherapy, Transference, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review