Theoretical and empirical concerns regarding the dark triad as a construct
Abstract
Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism are three constructs that have been collectively referred to as the "Dark Triad." Although researchers were initially interested in comparing similarities and differences between these constructs, in recent years researchers have combined items from the measures to create an overall measure of the Dark Triad as a single construct. The authors raise theoretical concerns regarding this approach, arguing that Machiavellianism and narcissism can be viewed as features or traits of psychopathy. They also provide empirical evidence from a large, correctional sample (N = 972) to demonstrate that a latent Dark Triad could not be estimated using confirmatory factor analysis because more than 100% of the variance was attributed to psychopathy. Moreover, the Dark Triad traits, by and large, did not confer incremental validity above and beyond psychopathy, and none of the interaction models indicated that additional information would be gained from considering the Dark Triad traits in constellation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research has considered Machiavellianism simply a less severe expression of clinical psychopathy.
“research has considered Machiavellianism simply a less severe expression of clinical psychopathy (52)”
From Empathy at the heart of darkness: empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. (2019) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 153
- Authors
- Glenn, A. L., & Sellbom, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Disorders
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 360-377
- ISSN
- 0885-579X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001389986
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- Dark Triad, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism, construct validity, latent trait models, incremental validity, personality traits, factor structure
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Mental Disorders, Concept Formation, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Machiavellianism, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Narcissism, Ohio, Prisoners, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review