Developmental Uncertainty versus Paranoid Regression
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collective states of mind are more powerful than individual ones.
“Collective states of mind are more powerful than individual ones, as groups can adopt extreme positions (Britton, 2010, p. 197).”
From The Role of Early Trauma in the Formation of Belief in Reptilian Conspiracy Theories: A Psychoanalytic Perspective (2023) · cites this paper as Britton, 2010, p. 197
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dixon, A. M. (2023) · British Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1111/bjp.12856 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Britton, R.
- Affiliations
- British Psychoanalytical Society (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Britton, Ronald
- Venue
- The Psychoanalytic Review
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-206
- ISSN
- 0033-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136229843
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychoanalytic Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
- Keywords
- regression analysis, psychoanalytic theory
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Culture, Humans, Human Development, Paranoid Behavior, Psychoanalytic Theory, Psychology, Social, Regression, Psychology, Uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
