Cited by 17Psychoanalysis and Social CritiquePsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity

Freud, Psychoanalysis and Anti-Semitism

Frosh, Stephen·2004·The Psychoanalytic Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/prev.91.3.309.38302

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Freud used folkloric and ethnographic evidence, some drawn from his own experience, to argue for the irrationality of antisemitism as a psychological problem of racialized hatred.

    “to argue for the irrationality of antisemitism as a psychological problem of racialized hatred (Fenichel 1940;Frosh 2004;Gilman 2025;Olmsted 2009;Oring 2007).”

    From Introduction: Folklore and Ethnology of Antisemitism (2026) · cites this paper as Frosh 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Abraham, K. and Freud, S. (1965) A Psychoanalytic Dialogue: The Letters of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham 1907-1926 New York: Basic Books
  2. Derrida, J. (1995) Archive fever: A Freudian Impression Chicago University of Chicago Press
  3. Freud, S. (1914) Totem and Taboo London: Hogarth Press (SE13, 1161, 1955)
  4. Freud, S. (1921) Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego London: Hogarth Press (SE18,65-143, 1955)
  5. Freud, S. (1930) Civilisation and its Discontents London: Hogarth Press (SE21, 57-145, 1961)
  6. Freud, S. (1937) Analysis Terminable and Interminable London: Hogarth Press (SE 23, 209-53, 1964).
  7. Freud, S. (1939) Moses and Monotheism London: Hogarth Press (SE23, 1-137, 1964)
  8. Freud, S. (1961) Letters of Sigmund Freud 1873-1939 (edited by E. Freud) London: Hogarth Press
  9. Gilman, S. (1991) Reading Freud in English: Problems, Paradoxes, and a Solution International Review of Psycho-Analysis 18 , 331-344
  10. Gilman, S. (1993) Freud, Race and Gender Princeton: Princeton University Press
  11. Klein, D. (1985) Jewish Origins of the Psychoanalytic Movement Chicago: Chicago University Press
  12. Kovel, J. (1995) On Racism and Psychoanalysis. In A. Elliott and S. Frosh (eds) Psychoanalysis in Contexts . London: Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frosh, S.
Affiliations
Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Frosh, Stephen
Venue
The Psychoanalytic Review
Published
2004-06
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
309-330
ISSN
0033-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080435749
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Psychoanalytic Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Keywords
Sigmund Freud, psychoanalysis, antisemitism
MeSH terms
Freudian Theory, Germany, Jews, Prejudice, Psychoanalysis, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review