The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Possible Selves and Performance: The Power of Self-Relevant Imagery
Abstract
Possible selves are elements of the self-concept that represent what individuals could become, would like to become, and are afraid of becoming. These representations of the self in the future are hypothesized to be an important component of effective performance. In Study 1, subjects either imagined being either successful in the future because of hard work, imagined being unsuccessful in the future despite hard work, or were given a positive mood inducement. These imagery manipulations were intended to increase the accessibility of specific possible selves. On a task involving effort and one involving persistence, subjects who imagined being successful performed the best. In Study 2, subjects either imagined being successful, imagined being unsuccessful, imagined another person being successful, or were put in a good mood. The success imagery group was relatively fast to accept positive, success-relevant possible selves as descriptive, and also relatively fast to reject negative, failure-relevant possible selves. These differences suggest that self-representations of future success were more readily accessible in the working self-concepts of these people than self-representations of future failure. In Study 3, people imagined themselves as either successful or unsuccessful in the future and imagined that either work or luck was responsible for these outcomes. Again, those in the “success due to work” condition were relatively fast to endorse positive, success-relevant possible selves and reject negative, failure-relevant possible selves. This group also worked the longest on a persistence task and scored the highest on a task-measuring effort. Together, the results suggest an important role for future-oriented representations of the self in performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806
Self-citationThe Perceived Competence Scale for Children
Harter, S. (1982) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129640 · Cited by 3,639
The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.
Greenwald, A. G. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.7.603 · Cited by 1,942
An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success.
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.940 · Cited by 533
Cited by
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246 · Cited by 3,889
Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review.
Covington, M. V. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171 · Cited by 1,316
The Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3 · Cited by 1,315
Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action.
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188 · Cited by 852
The Health Benefits of Writing about Life Goals
King, L. A. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201277003 · Cited by 795
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruvolo, A. P., & Markus, H. R.
- Venue
- Social Cognition
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-124
- ISSN
- 0278-016X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987863856
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.