Cited by 192Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Ventromedial and orbital prefrontal neurons differentially encode internally and externally driven motivational values in monkeys

Open access
Bouret, S., Richmond, B. J.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The value of events that predict future rewards, thereby driving behavior, is sensitive to information arising from external (environmental) and internal factors. The ventral prefrontal cortex, an anatomically heterogeneous area, has information related to this value. We designed experiments to compare the contribution of two distinct subregions, orbital and ventromedial, of the ventral prefrontal cortex to the encoding of internal and external factors controlling the perceived motivational value. We recorded the activity of single neurons in both regions in monkeys while manipulating internal and external factors that should affect the perceived value of task events. Neurons in both regions encoded the value of task events, with orbitofrontal neurons being more sensitive to external factors such as visual cues and ventromedial neurons being more sensitive to internal factors such as satiety. Thus, the orbitofrontal cortex emphasizes signals for evaluating environment-centered, externally driven motivational processes, whereas ventromedial prefrontal cortex emphasizes signals more suited for subject-centered, internally driven motivational processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0049-10.2010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 192

Authors
Bouret, S., & Richmond, B. J.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-06-23
Volume
30
Issue
25
Pages
8591-8601
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2070485861
Cited by
192
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002032, ZIAMH002619)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
ventromedial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, motivational value, reward prediction, single-unit recording, satiety, visual cues, monkeys, neural coding
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Drive, Electrophysiology, Macaca mulatta, Male, Motivation, Neurons, Reaction Time, Reward, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review