The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation of axonal regeneration and slow component B in two branches of a single axon
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the relationship between slow axonal transport and axonal regeneration in the rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cell. The DRG cell sends out a single axon which bifurcates within the ganglion; one axon proceeds centrally into the spinal cord and the other proceeds peripherally. The rate of axonal regeneration is approximately 2 times faster for the peripheral processes (4.6 +/- 0.9 mm/day) than for the central processes (2.1 +/- 0.5 mm/day). The peripheral and central processes regenerate through dissimilar environments (sciatic nerve and dorsal root, respectively); thus, environmental factors may account for the differences in regeneration rates. We tested this possibility by measuring the regeneration of motoneuron axons within the ventral root (histologically similar to the dorsal root). The motoneuron regeneration rate within the ventral root is similar to the motoneuron regeneration rate within the sciatic nerve, suggesting that factors within the DRG cell produce the differences in regeneration rate. Slow axonal transport is classified into two distinct components: slow component a (SCa), corresponding to the microtubule/neurofilament network of the axonal cytoskeleton, and slow component b (SCb), corresponding to the microfilament complex/axoplasmic matrix. The transport rate of SCa and SCb in the peripheral sensory axons is approximately 2 times faster than their counterparts in the central sensory axons. SCa moves at 1.0 to 3.0 mm/day in the peripheral processes and 0.5 to 1.0 mm/day in the central processes; SCb moves at 3.5 to 6.5 mm/day in the peripheral processes and 2.0 to 3.5 mm/day in the central processes. In each branch of the DRG cell, the rate of axonal regeneration is similar to the rate of SCb transport. These results support the hypothesis that SCb is a rate-limiting factor in axonal regeneration because of its role in providing the cytoskeletal elements which are directly involved in the motility of the growth cone and elongation of the axon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration
Fu, S. Y., & Gordon, T. (1997) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740621 · Cited by 1,202
Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration
Scheib, J., & Höke, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.227 · Cited by 758
Neuronal Intrinsic Mechanisms of Axon Regeneration
Liu, K., Tedeschi, A., Park, K. K., & He, Z. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113723 · Cited by 458
Axonal transport of the cytoplasmic matrix.
Lasek, R. J., Garner, J. A., & Brady, S. T. (1984) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.99.1.212s · Cited by 298
Self-citationAl-Majed, A. A., Tam, S. L., & Gordon, T. (2004) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1023/b:cemn.0000022770.66463.f7 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Wujek, Jr., & Lasek, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1983-02-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-251
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1598343541
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation of axonal regeneration and slow component B in two branches of a single axon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.03-02-00243.1983
- The paper
- Wujek, Jr., & Lasek, R. (1983). Correlation of axonal regeneration and slow component B in two branches of a single axon. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.03-02-00243.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.