The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl
Open accessAbstract
Space-specific neurons, found in the barn owl's inferior colliculus, respond selectively to a narrow range of interaural time and intensity differences. We show that injecting a local anesthetic into one cochlear nucleus, nucleus magnocellularis, alters the space-specific cell's selectivity for interaural time difference, leaving its selectivity for interaural intensity difference intact. Anesthetizing the other cochlear nucleus, nucleus angularis, has the converse effects. We show also that the space-specific neuron's selectivity for one interaural cue is the same for all effective values of the other cue. We conclude that time and intensity cues are processed in separate neural channels of the barn owl's auditory system and that the two cues operate independently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mechanisms and functions of synaptic facilitation.
Jackman, S. L., & Regehr, W. G. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.047 · Cited by 489
Bell, C., & Grant, K. (1989) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.09-03-01029.1989 · Cited by 122
How the owl tracks its prey – II
Takahashi, T. T. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.031195 · Cited by 34
Self-citationDirectional Hearing in Owls: Neurobiology, Behaviour and Evolution
Volman, S. F. (1994) · Perception and Motor Control in Birds · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75869-0_17 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Takahashi, T., Moiseff, A., & Konishi, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1984-07-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1781-1786
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1516914813
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
