Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An immunohistochemical and quantitative examination of dorsal root ganglion neuronal subpopulations

Open access
Price, J·1985·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Sensory neurons of adult rat lumbar dorsal root ganglia were labeled in cryostat sections with antisera against tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), substance P (SP), and somatostatin (SOM), and with a monoclonal antibody (RT97) that labels the 145- and 200-kilodalton (kd) subunits of neurofilaments. These neurons were also histochemically stained for fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase (FRAP), and the size and distribution of each population were determined. In addition, the double-label immunoperoxidase technique of Sternberger and Joseph (Sternberger, L.A., and S.A. Joseph (1979) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 27: 1424–1429) was employed to determine whether these antibodies labeled distinct or overlapping populations of neurons. The results indicate that the dopaminergic (TH+) cells constitute a separate population from the SP+ and SOM+ neurons and that the size distributions of the SP+, SOM+, TH+, and FRAP+ cells are all different despite the fact that all of these subpopulations are part of the “small dark” subpopulation as indicated by their size and by the fact that they are RT97-. RT97 is a putative marker for the “large light” population (Anderton, B., H.B. Coakham, J. A. Garson, A.A. Harper, and S.N. Lawson (1982) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 334: 97–98P). Furthermore, the distribution data indicate that all of the “small dark” cell subpopulations are not evenly distributed within the ganglion, and the staining with RT97 and with another antibody which recognizes the 68-kd neurofilament subunit indicates heterogeneity among the “large light” population. These results are discussed in terms of the significance of the “small dark”-“large light” classification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.05-08-02051.1985

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Price, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1985-08-01
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
2051-2059
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1493164359
Cited by
199
References
0
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An immunohistochemical and quantitative examination of dorsal root ganglion neuronal subpopulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.05-08-02051.1985
The paper
Price, J. (1985). An immunohistochemical and quantitative examination of dorsal root ganglion neuronal subpopulations. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.05-08-02051.1985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.