Cited by 84Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Biochemical support for the “threshold” theory of creativity: a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study

Open access
Jung, Rex E., Gasparovic, Charles, Chavez, Robert S., Flores, Ranee A., Smith, Shirley M., Caprihan, Arvind, Yeo, Ronald A.·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

A broadly accepted definition of creativity refers to the production of something both novel and useful within a given social context. Studies of patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders and neuroimaging studies of healthy controls have each drawn attention to frontal and temporal lobe contributions to creativity. Based on previous magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy studies demonstrating relationships between cognitive ability and concentrations of N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), a common neurometabolite, we hypothesized that NAA assessed in gray and white matter (from a supraventricular slab) would relate to laboratory measures of creativity. MR imaging and divergent thinking measures were obtained in a cohort of 56 healthy controls. Independent judges ranked the creative products of each participant, from which a “Composite Creativity Index” (CCI) was created. Different patterns of correlations between NAA and CCI were found in higher verbal ability versus lower verbal ability participants, providing neurobiological support for a critical “threshold” regarding the relationship between intelligence and creativity. To our knowledge, this is the first report assessing the relationship between brain chemistry and creative cognition, as measured with divergent thinking, in a cohort comprised exclusively of normal, healthy participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0588-09.2009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of cognitive control in creative thought remains controversial.

    “Nevertheless, the role of cognitive control in creative thought remains controversial, as other work supports a defocused attention account of creativity (Takeuchi et al., 2011) and a limit to the correlation between creativity and intelligence (Jauk et al., 2013, Jung et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Asari T Konishi S Jimura K Chikazoe J Nakamura N Miyashita Y 2008 Right temporopolar activation associated with unique perception Neuroimage 41 145 152 18374603
  2. Bechtereva NP Korotkov AD Pakhomov SV Roudas MS Starchenko MG Medvedev SV 2004 PET study of brain maintenance of verbal creative activity Int J Psychophysiol 53 11 20 15172131
  3. Botvinick MM Braver TS Barch DM Carter CS Cohen JD 2001 Conflict monitoring and cognitive control Psych Rev 108 624 652 11488380
  4. Carlsson I Wendt PE Risberg J 2000 On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects Neuropsychologia 38 873 885 10689061
  5. Dietrich A 2003 Functional neuroanatomy of altered states of consciousness: the transient hypofrontality hypothesis Conscious Cogn 12 231 256 12763007
  6. Dietrich A 2004 The cognitive neuroscience of creativity Psychon Bull Rev 11 1011 1026 15875970
  7. Dietrich A 2007 Who’s afraid of a cognitive neuroscience of creativity? Methods 42 22 27 17434412
  8. Fink A Neubauer AC 2006 EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence Int J Psychophysiol 62 46 53 16503062
  9. Holroyd CB Nieuwenhuis S Yeung N Nystrom L Mars RB Coles MG Cohen JD 2004 Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals Nat Neurosci 7 497 498 15097995
  10. Howard-Jones PA Blakemore SJ Samuel EA Summers IR Claxton G 2005 Semantic divergence and creative story generation: an fMRI investigation Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25 240 250 15993573
  11. Jausovec N Jausovec K 2000 Differences in resting EEG related to ability Brain Topogr 12 229 240 10791685
  12. Jung-Beeman M 2005 Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language Trends Cogn Sci 9 512 518 16214387
  13. Jung RE Haier RJ 2007 The parietofrontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence Behav Brain Sci 30 135 154 17655784
  14. Lezak MD Howieson DB Loring DW Hannay HJ Fischer JS 2004 Neuropsychological assessment New York Oxford UP
  15. Moffett JR Ross B Arun P Madhavarao CN Namboodiri AM 2007 N-Acetylaspartate in the CNS: from neurodiagnostics to neurobiology Prog Neurobiol 81 89 131 17275978 PMC1919520
  16. Ridderinkhof KR Ullsperger M Crone EA Nieuwenhuis S 2004 The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control Science 306 443 447 15486290
  17. Simonton DK 2003 Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives Psychol Bull 129 475 494 12848217
  18. Sternberg RJ 2005 Handbook of creativity New York Cambridge UP

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jung, R. E., Gasparovic, C., Chavez, R. S., Flores, R. A., Smith, S. M., Caprihan, A., & Yeo, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Mind Research Network (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-04-22
Volume
29
Issue
16
Pages
5319-5325
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1966745594
Cited by
84
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB020407, R01EB006841)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR021938)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
creativity, N-acetylaspartate, divergent thinking, neurometabolites, gray and white matter, verbal ability, healthy controls, frontal and temporal lobes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Chemistry, Cognition, Creativity, Differential Threshold, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review