Cited by 479Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethics

Gray, Jeremy R., Thompson, Paul M.·2004·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1405

Cites

171 of 171 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluid intelligence outcome tasks were selected according to published guidelines listing metrics that load strongly on Gf.

    “In our selection of Gf tasks, we followed previously published guidelines that include a list of common metrics that load strongly on Gf (Ackerman, Beier, & Boyle, 2005;Gray & Thompson, 2004).”

    From Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Gray & Thompson, 2004

  • The RPM-test is one of the best measures of general intelligence.

    “A recent review showed that the RPM-test is one of the best measures of general intelligence (Gray & Thompson, 2004).”

    From Altruistic behavior as a costly signal of general intelligence (2007) · cites this paper as Gray & Thompson, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, J. R., & Thompson, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2004-06
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
471-482
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2149849723
Cited by
479
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  • National Center for Research Resources
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
intelligence, lateral prefrontal cortex, heritability of intelligence, brain structure, environmental influences on intelligence, cognitive enhancement, psychometrics
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Intelligence, Neurobiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review