Cited by 121Tactile and Sensory InteractionsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeural dynamics and brain function

Respiration, Heartbeat, and Conscious Tactile Perception

Open access
Grund, Martin, Al, Esra, Pabst, Marc, Dabbagh, Alice, Stephani, Tilman, Nierhaus, Till, Gaebler, Michael, Villringer, Arno·2022·The Journal of Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that timing of sensory stimulation during the cardiac cycle interacts with perception. Given the natural coupling of respiration and cardiac activity, we investigated here their joint effects on tactile perception. Forty-one healthy female and male human participants reported conscious perception of finger near-threshold electrical pulses (33% null trials) and decision confidence while electrocardiography, respiratory activity, and finger photoplethysmography were recorded. Participants adapted their respiratory cycle to expected stimulus onsets to preferentially occur during late inspiration/early expiration. This closely matched heart rate variation (sinus arrhythmia) across the respiratory cycle such that most frequent stimulation onsets occurred during the period of highest heart rate probably indicating highest alertness and cortical excitability. Tactile detection rate was highest during the first quadrant after expiration onset. Interindividually, stronger respiratory phase-locking to the task was associated with higher detection rates. Regarding the cardiac cycle, we confirmed previous findings that tactile detection rate was higher during diastole than systole and newly specified its minimum at 250–300 ms after the R-peak corresponding to the pulse wave arrival in the finger. Expectation of stimulation induced a transient heart deceleration which was more pronounced for unconfident decision ratings. Interindividually, stronger poststimulus modulations of heart rate were linked to higher detection rates. In summary, we demonstrate how tuning to the respiratory cycle and integration of respiratory-cardiac signals are used to optimize performance of a tactile detection task. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Mechanistic studies on perception and cognition tend to focus on the brain neglecting contributions of the body. Here, we investigated how respiration and heartbeat influence tactile perception: respiration phase-locking to expected stimulus onsets corresponds to highest heart rate (and presumably alertness/cortical excitability) and correlates with detection performance. Tactile detection varies across the heart cycle with a minimum when the pulse reaches the finger and a maximum in diastole. Taken together with our previous finding of unchanged early event-related potentials across the cardiac cycle, we conclude that these effects are not a peripheral physiological artifact but a result of cognitive processes that model our body's internal state, make predictions to guide behavior, and might also tune respiration to serve the task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0592-21.2021

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac cycle duration is systematically modified by stimulus presentation and target detection, with a small but consistent change.

    “In perceptual and cognitive paradigms, cardiac cycle duration is also systematically modified 31-36 with a small but consistent change of cardiac cycle duration induced by stimulus presentation and target detection.”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Cardiac interbeat interval results report a small, significant post-stimulus difference: intervals following hits were 5.2 ms longer than those following misses. But the Heart slowing and perceptual decision making section says deceleration also occurred on trials without stimulation and was mainly associated with decision confidence when that was taken into account. The paper therefore supports a small, systematic change in cardiac-cycle duration, but not the unqualified attribution of that change to stimulus presentation and target detection. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the somatosensory domain, findings are mostly congruent with the pulsed inhibition hypothesis.

    “In the somatosensory domain, findings are mostly congruent with the pulsed inhibition hypothesis 35,36,58,59 ;”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

  • In humans, the detection of faint tactile stimuli is facilitated at the beginning of expiration.

    “In humans, the detection of faint tactile stimuli is facilitated at the beginning of expiration 36 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Al E, Iliopoulos F, Forschack N, Nierhaus T, Grund M, Motyka P, Gaebler M, Nikulin VV, Villringer A (2020) Heart-brain interactions shape somatosensory perception and evoked potentials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 7:201915629.
  2. Allen M, Levy A, Parr T, Friston KJ (2019) In the body's eye: the computational anatomy of interoceptive inference. bioRxiv Available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/603928. · DOI
  3. Friston K (2005) A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions Royal Soc B Biological Sci 360:815-836.
  4. FAA, Prins N (2009) Psychophysics. Academic Press Inc.
  5. Kluger DS, Balestrieri E, Busch NA, Gross J (2021) Respiration aligns perception with neural excitability. Biorxiv:2021.03.25.436938.
  6. Kruschke JK (2015) Doing Bayesian Data Analysis (Second Edition). Academic Press.
  7. Nierhaus T, Forschack N, Piper SK, Holtze S, Krause T, Taskin B, Long X, Stelzer J, Margulies DS, Steinbrink J, Villringer A (2015) Imperceptible somatosensory stimulation alters sensorimotor background rhythm and connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience 35:5917-5925.
  8. Ohl S, Wohltat C, Kliegl R, Pollatos O, Engbert R (2016) Microsaccades Are Coupled to Heartbeat. Journal of Neuroscience 36:1237-1241.
  9. Pewsey A, Neuhäuser M, Ruxton GD (2013) Circular Statistics in R. Oxford University Press.
  10. Schubert R, Haufe S, Blankenburg F, Villringer A, Curio G (2009) Now you'll feel it, now you won't: EEG rhythms predict the effectiveness of perceptual masking. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21:2407-2419.
  11. Stephani T, Hodapp A, Idaji MJ, Villringer A, Nikulin VV (2021) Neural excitability and sensory input determine intensity perception with opposing directions in initial cortical responses. bioRxiv.
  12. Tass P, Rosenblum MG, Weule J, Kurths J, Pikovsky A, J V, Schnitzler A, Freund H- J (1998) Detection of n:m Phase Locking from Noisy Data: Application to Magnetoencephalography. Physical Review Letters 81:3291-3294.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grund, M., Al, E., Pabst, M., Dabbagh, A., Stephani, T., Nierhaus, T., Gaebler, M., & Villringer, A.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Grund, Martin
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2021-12-01
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
643-656
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W3217504446
Cited by
121
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
tactile perception, respiration, heart rate, cardiac cycle, sinus arrhythmia, tactile detection, decision confidence, body awareness, interoception, pulse wave, diastole
MeSH terms
Adult, Consciousness, Decision Making, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Physical Stimulation, Respiratory Mechanics, Touch Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review