Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relative effectiveness of C primary afferent fibers of different origins in evoking a prolonged facilitation of the flexor reflex in the rat

Open access
Woolf, CJ, Wall, PD·1986·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Changes in the excitability of the hamstring flexor withdrawal reflex produced by conditioning stimuli applied to C-afferent fibers of different origins have been examined in the decerebrate spinal rat. In the absence of conditioning stimuli, the flexor reflex elicited by a standard suprathreshold mechanical stimulus to the toes is stable when tested repeatedly for hours. Three categories of conditioning stimuli have been used in an attempt to modify the excitability of the flexor reflex; electrical stimulation of a cutaneous (sural) nerve or a muscle (gastrocnemius-soleus) nerve at C-fiber strength; the application of mustard oil, a chemical irritant that activates chemosensitive C- afferents, to the skin or injected intramuscularly and intraarticularly; and the indirect activation of high-threshold muscle afferents by fused tetanic contractions of the tibial muscles. Conditioning stimuli of an intensity sufficient to activate C-afferent fibers result in a heterosynaptic facilitation of the flexor motoneuronal response to the standard test input, which lasts from 3 min to more than 3 hr, depending on the stimulus and the C-afferents activated. Pretreatment of the sciatic nerve with the C-fiber neurotoxin capsaicin abolishes all the postconditioning facilitations, which is an indication that it is likely that it is C-afferents that are primarily responsible for the facilitatory effects of the conditioning stimuli, although some A delta afferents may contribute. Capsaicin pretreatment does not modify the reflex response to the test stimulus. The most prolonged increase in the excitability of the flexor reflex resulted from intraarticular injections of 5 microliter mustard oil. Using the subsequent injection of lignocaine intraarticulary, it was found that the prolonged facilitation of the reflex is triggered by the afferent input generated by the conditioning stimulus and does not require an ongoing input for its maintenance. These results indicate that there is a spectrum of central changes in the stimulus response relations of the spinal cord resulting from the activation of C-fibers of different origins. The prolonged duration of some of these changes means that the peripheral activation of C-afferents will modify the functional response of the spinal cord to other inputs applied long after the conditioning input, and this may be responsible for some ofthe sensory and motor alterations found after peripheral tissue injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.06-05-01433.1986

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Woolf, C., & Wall, P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1986-05-01
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
1433-1442
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1809981752
Cited by
559
References
0
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative effectiveness of C primary afferent fibers of different origins in evoking a prolonged facilitation of the flexor reflex in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.06-05-01433.1986
The paper
Woolf, C., & Wall, P. (1986). Relative effectiveness of C primary afferent fibers of different origins in evoking a prolonged facilitation of the flexor reflex in the rat. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.06-05-01433.1986

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.