Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 518

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor supports the survival of cultured rat retinal ganglion cells

Open access
Johnson, JE, Barde, YA, Schwab, M, Thoenen, H·1986·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a small, basic protein purified from the mammalian brain that has been shown previously to support the survival of cultured spinal sensory neurons (Barde et al., 1982). In current studies, BDNF was tested for its ability to support the survival of cultured CNS cells isolated from the perinatal rat retina. Both immunofluorescent labeling of Thy-1 and prior retrograde labeling with HRP were used as retinal ganglion cell markers in vitro. With embryonic day (E) 17 retinas, it was found that BDNF allowed the survival of a small subpopulation of neurons (about 7% of the cells plated at this age) identified by the immunofluorescent labeling of Thy- 1. No detectable effects were seen when either the total number of cells or the number of tetanus toxin-positive neurons was measured. BDNF also had an effect on cultured neurons retrogradely labeled after HRP injections in the superior colliculi of neonatal rats. The BDNF- responsive population was therefore detected only in retinal cultures with specific markers and identified as consisting of retinal ganglion cells. These cells could be enriched about 80-fold by density gradient centrifugation, and purified ganglion cell cultures were shown to be responsive to BDNF. Whereas with E17 retinas, the number of surviving Thy-1 positive neurons could be kept constant for at least 4 d, the survival of postnatal neurons was only transiently increased by BDNF. We conclude that in the retina, BDNF affects only the survival of ganglion cells in vitro by a direct action on these cells. The results are discussed in terms of target-derived neurotrophic support during development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.06-10-03031.1986

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 518

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, J., Barde, Y., Schwab, M., & Thoenen, H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1986-10-01
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
3031-3038
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1600830780
Cited by
518
References
1
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor supports the survival of cultured rat retinal ganglion cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.06-10-03031.1986
The paper
Johnson, J., Barde, Y., Schwab, M., & Thoenen, H. (1986). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor supports the survival of cultured rat retinal ganglion cells. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.06-10-03031.1986

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.