Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inward rectification of resting and opiate-activated potassium currents in rat locus coeruleus neurons

Open access
Williams, JT, North, RA, Tokimasa, T·1988·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Intracellular recordings were made from rat locus coeruleus neurons in vitro, and membrane currents were measured at potentials from -50 to - 130 mV. In the absence of any applied agonists, the slope conductance of the cells increased 3-fold when the cell was hyperpolarized from -60 to -120 mV. This conductance increase was complete within 5 msec of the onset of a hyperpolarizing command and was subsequently independent of time for several seconds. The conductance increase was blocked by cesium chloride (1–2 mM), rubidium chloride (1–2 mM), or barium chloride (1–100 microM). The membrane potential range over which the conductance increased was centered at the potassium equilibrium potential (EK; extracellular potassium concentration, 2.5–10.5 mM): the current/voltage (I/V) relation of the cell could be well described by supposing that there were 2 potassium conductances, one voltage independent (G1) and the other (inward rectifier, Gir) activated according to the expression Gir = Gir,max/(1 + exp[(V - EK)/k]), where k ranged from 15 mV in 2.5 mM potassium to 6 mV in 10.5 mM potassium. The additional membrane potassium conductance that developed when agonists at mu-opioid and alpha 2-adrenoceptors were applied also became larger with membrane hyperpolarization, and this voltage dependence was also reduced or blocked by rubidium, cesium, and barium; in the presence of these agonists the current also reached its final value within 5 msec. However, the conductance increased by the agonists (Gag) was not well expressed by simply increasing the values of G1 and Gir,max. It was best described by a potassium conductance that increased according to Gag,max/(1 + exp[(V - Vm)/k]), where Vm (the potential at which the conductance was half-maximum) was close to the resting potential of the cell.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.08-11-04299.1988

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Williams, J., North, R., & Tokimasa, T.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1988-11-01
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
4299-4306
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1617932235
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inward rectification of resting and opiate-activated potassium currents in rat locus coeruleus neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.08-11-04299.1988
The paper
Williams, J., North, R., & Tokimasa, T. (1988). Inward rectification of resting and opiate-activated potassium currents in rat locus coeruleus neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.08-11-04299.1988

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.