The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain Mechanisms of Serial and Parallel Processing during Dual-Task Performance
Open accessAbstract
The psychological refractory period (PRP) refers to the fact that humans typically cannot perform two tasks at once. Behavioral experiments have led to the proposal that, in fact, peripheral perceptual and motor stages continue to operate in parallel, and that only a central decision stage imposes a serial bottleneck. We tested this model using neuroimaging methods combined with innovative time-sensitive analysis tools. Subjects performed a dual-task visual–auditory paradigm in which a delay of 300 ms was injected into the auditory task either within or outside of the dual-task interference period. Event-related potentials indicated that the first ∼250 ms of processing were insensitive to dual-task interference, and that the PRP was mainly reflected in a delayed global component. By a clustering analysis based on time-resolved functional magnetic resonance imaging, we identified networks with qualitatively different timing properties: sensory areas tracked the objective time of stimulus presentation, a bilateral parietoprefrontal network correlated with the PRP delay, and an extended bilateral network that included bilateral posterior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, anterior part of the insula, and cerebellum was shared by both tasks during the extent of dual-task performance. The results provide physiological evidence for the coexistence of serial and parallel processes within a cognitive task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework
Dehaene, S. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00123-2 · Cited by 2,498 · cited 1×
“According to this theory, a distributed set of neurons with long axons provides a global “broadcasting” system enabling communication between arbitrary and otherwise not directly connected brain processors (Baars, 1989; Dehaene et al., 1998; Dehaene and Naccache, 2001).”
Self-citationCommon regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands
Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01633-7 · Cited by 2,498
Capacity limits of information processing in the brain
Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.010 · Cited by 928
Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink
Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1549 · Cited by 888
Self-citationBrain Dynamics Underlying the Nonlinear Threshold for Access to Consciousness
Del Cul, A., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050260 · Cited by 753
Self-citation
Cited by
Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018 · Cited by 2,573
Self-citationAn opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381
Shine, J. M., Bissett, P. G., Bell, P. T., Koyejo, O., Balsters, J. H., Gorgolewski, K. J., Moodie, C. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.018 · Cited by 886
Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences
Pallier, C., Devauchelle, A.-D., & Dehaene, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018711108 · Cited by 691
Self-citationErnst, M., & Fudge, J. L. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.009 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-07-23
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 7585-7598
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2079589941
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain Mechanisms of Serial and Parallel Processing during Dual-Task Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.0948-08.2008
- The paper
- Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Brain Mechanisms of Serial and Parallel Processing during Dual-Task Performance. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0948-08.2008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.