The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution of photoreceptor subtypes in the retina of diurnal and nocturnal primates
Open accessAbstract
We have used antibodies specific to either the red/green-or blue- sensitive cones in order to compare their ratio and distributions to that of the rods in the retinae of 3 primate species that differ in their capacity for color vision. We have found that the monoclonal antibody CSA-1 (Johnson and Hageman, 1988) and the polyclonal antibody 4942A, specific to the red- and green-cone opsin (Lerea et al., 1989), applied to retinal whole-mounts labeled approximately 90% of all cones in the diurnal Old-World rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) and all of the cones in the nocturnal New-World owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus) and nocturnal prosimian bushbaby (Galago garnetti). The polyclonal antibody 108B, specific to the blue-cone opsin (Lerea et al., 1989), labeled about 10% of the cones across the entire surface of the rhesus monkey retina, but failed to label any cones in the retina of the 2 nocturnal species. Only the retina of the rhesus monkey possessed an all-cone foveola in which the density of cone inner segments was 17-fold greater than that in the fovea of the owl monkey or bushbaby retina. Surprisingly, the density of cones per unit area outside of the fovea was comparable in all 3 species. Rod density in the dorsal retina was elevated in all animals examined, but was 2-3 times greater in the nocturnal species than in the rhesus monkey retina. Application of the photoreceptor-class-specific antibodies may provide further insights into the evolution and development of wavelength sensitivity in the retina, as well as enhance our understanding of normal and abnormal color vision in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Major Cell Populations of the Mouse Retina
Jeon, C.-J., Strettoi, E., & Masland, R. H. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-21-08936.1998 · Cited by 1,429
Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores
Barton, R. A., Purvis, A., & Harvey, P. H. (1995) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0076 · Cited by 352
Evolution and spectral tuning of visual pigments in birds and mammals
Hunt, D. M., Carvalho, L. S., Cowing, J. A., & Davies, W. L. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0044 · Cited by 234
Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
Ramkumar, H. L., Zhang, J., & Chan, C.-C. (2010) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.02.002 · Cited by 163
Fixation strategies for retinal immunohistochemistry
Stradleigh, T. W., & Ishida, A. T. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.04.001 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Wikler, K., & Rakic, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1990-10-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3390-3401
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1956556420
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of photoreceptor subtypes in the retina of diurnal and nocturnal primates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.10-10-03390.1990
- The paper
- Wikler, K., & Rakic, P. (1990). Distribution of photoreceptor subtypes in the retina of diurnal and nocturnal primates. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.10-10-03390.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.