Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 582

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival effect of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) on chick embryonic motoneurons in culture: comparison with other neurotrophic factors and cytokines

Open access
Arakawa, Y, Sendtner, M, Thoenen, H·1990·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In previous studies, it has been demonstrated that ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) has a potent survival effect on various populations of neurons in culture, in particular, neurons isolated from chick ciliary, dorsal root sensory, and sympathetic ganglia (Barbin et al., 1984). After recent investigations demonstrated that CNTF prevents the degeneration of motoneurons in newborn rats after axonal lesion (Sendtner et al., 1990), the question arose as to whether CNTF also has a survival effect on embryonic chick motoneurons at the developmental stage where physiological cell death occurs. To study this, it was essential to develop an isolation and culture procedure for the survival of chick E6 spinal motoneurons in which non-neuronal cells were eliminated and the motoneurons were highly enriched. In these cultures, virtually all of the initially plated motoneurons survived for at least 3 d in the presence of muscle extract, which was chosen as a positive control. Retrograde labeling of the motoneurons prior to their isolation showed that there is more than an 80% enrichment for motoneurons by the method used. The retrogradely labeled neurons also fulfilled the morphological criteria (diameter of neurons, appearance of processes) to identify motoneurons independent of retrograde labeling. Under these conditions, CNTF at a concentration of 1.5 ng/ml (EC50, 0.023 ng/ml) supported maximally 64% of the initially plated spinal motoneurons after 3 d and 53% after 6 d (the longest time period investigated). Other neurotrophic factors, such as NGF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and neurotrophin-3, had no survival effect at all, even at concentrations up to 10 micrograms/ml for NGF and BDNF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.10-11-03507.1990

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 582

Metadata

Authors
Arakawa, Y., Sendtner, M., & Thoenen, H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1990-11-01
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
3507-3515
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1517125774
Cited by
582
References
3
FWCI
17.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival effect of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) on chick embryonic motoneurons in culture: comparison with other neurotrophic factors and cytokines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.10-11-03507.1990
The paper
Arakawa, Y., Sendtner, M., & Thoenen, H. (1990). Survival effect of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) on chick embryonic motoneurons in culture: comparison with other neurotrophic factors and cytokines. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.10-11-03507.1990

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.