The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory
Open accessAbstract
Most theories of attention propose that we maintain attentional templates in visual working memory to control what information is selected. In the present study, we directly tested this proposal by measuring the contralateral-delay activity (CDA) of human event-related potentials during visual search tasks in which the target is cued on each trial. Here we show that the CDA can be used to measure the maintenance of attentional templates in visual working memory while processing complex visual scenes. In addition, this method allowed us to directly observe the shift from working memory to long-term memory representations controlling attention as learning occurred and experience accrued searching for the same target object. Our findings provide definitive support for several critical proposals made in theories of attention, learning, and automaticity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1913) · Henry Holt and Company eBooks · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,226
A feature-integration theory of attention.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 · Cited by 12,366
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Visual search and stimulus similarity.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.433 · Cited by 3,563
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.0001 · Cited by 2,531
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I
Schneider, W. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Cited by 2,228
Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity
Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02447 · Cited by 1,810
Cited by
‘Activity-silent’ working memory in prefrontal cortex: a dynamic coding framework
Stokes, M. G. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.004 · Cited by 850
Guided Search 6.0: an updated model of visual search
Wolfe, J. M. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9 · Cited by 703
Kundu, B., Sutterer, D. W., Emrich, S. M., & Postle, B. R. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5565-12.2013 · Cited by 161
The cognitive neuroscience of visual short-term memory
Postle, B. R. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.08.004 · Cited by 149
Perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets
Gorbunova, E. S. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.010 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-06-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 9315-9322
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2063667579
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.1097-11.2011
- The paper
- Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1097-11.2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
