Cited by 161Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Strengthened effective connectivity underlies transfer of working memory training to tests of short-term memory and attention

Open access
Kundu, Bornali, Sutterer, David W., Emrich, Stephen M., Postle, Bradley R.·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Although long considered a natively endowed and fixed trait, working memory (WM) ability has recently been shown to improve with intensive training. What remains controversial and poorly understood, however, are the neural bases of these training effects and the extent to which WM training gains transfer to other cognitive tasks. Here we present evidence from human electrophysiology (EEG) and simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG that the transfer of WM training to other cognitive tasks is supported by changes in task-related effective connectivity in frontoparietal and parieto-occipital networks that are engaged by both the trained and transfer tasks. One consequence of this effect is greater efficiency of stimulus processing, as evidenced by changes in EEG indices of individual differences in short-term memory capacity and in visual search performance. Transfer to search-related activity provides evidence that something more fundamental than task-specific strategy or stimulus-specific representations has been learned. Furthermore, these patterns of training and transfer highlight the role of common neural systems in determining individual differences in aspects of visuospatial cognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5565-12.2013

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual n-back working memory training has been associated with improvement on similar dual n-back tasks, other tasks of working memory, and fluid intelligence.

    “Dual n-back working memory training has been associated with improvement on similar dual n-back tasks, other tasks of working memory, and the broader construct of fluid intelligence [5–18]”
  • Studies reporting performance gains in digit span and reading span after dual n-back training suggest that training increases ability on untrained, closely related tasks (near transfer effects).

    “Studies reporting performance gains in tasks such as digit span and reading span [6–8, 10,12] after dual n-back training suggest that training increases ability not only on the trained task (i.e., practice effects), but also on untrained, closely related tasks (near transfer effects).”
  • Near and far transfer effects, albeit mixed, have been demonstrated after dual n-back training in younger (e.g., under 30) and older (e.g., over 60) age groups.

    “Although near and far transfer effects, albeit mixed, have been demonstrated after dual n-back training in younger (e.g., under 30) and older (e.g., over 60) age groups [5–12,15,17,18] effects were not previously investigated in a middle age-range sample.”
  • Effects of dual n-back training were not previously investigated in a middle age-range sample.

    “Although near and far transfer effects, albeit mixed, have been demonstrated after dual n-back training in younger (e.g., under 30) and older (e.g., over 60) age groups [5–12,15,17,18] effects were not previously investigated in a middle age-range sample.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kundu, B., Sutterer, D. W., Emrich, S. M., & Postle, B. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Brock University (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-05-15
Volume
33
Issue
20
Pages
8705-8715
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2076323188
Cited by
161
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 9
FWCI
26.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH064498, MH-095428, MH064498, R01MH095984, F30MH095428)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008692)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory training, transfer of training, effective connectivity, short-term memory capacity, visual search, attention, frontoparietal network, individual differences, visuospatial cognition, transcranial magnetic stimulation, EEG
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Color Perception, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Transfer, Psychology, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review