The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NMDA channel behavior depends on agonist affinity
Open accessAbstract
We have compared the kinetic properties of NMDA receptor channels activated by exogenous agonists with those activated synaptically. Short (4 msec) applications of L-glutamate to outside-out patches from hippocampal neurons evoked currents that decayed with a double exponential time course that was controlled by both the unbinding rate of agonist and receptor desensitization. Lower-affinity agonists evoked NMDA receptor-activated currents that had faster rates of decay and recovered from desensitization more quickly, consistent with the idea that agonists which dissociate faster allow the receptor to reach a desensitized state less often. Both synaptic and patch responses could be well fitted with a simple kinetic model comprised of two independent but identical binding sites, one open state, one closed state, and one desensitized state, all doubly liganded. Provided that the agonist has a slow unbinding rate relative to the rates into the open and desensitized states (e.g., L-glutamate), this model predicts a response with two decay phases and can thus account for the synaptic response. Since the unbinding rate is the critical determinant of the time course, different affinity transmitters would affect such properties as excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) duration. Of the known endogenous excitatory amino acids, only L-glutamate has an affinity for the NMDA receptor consistent with the time course of the EPSC recorded between hippocampal neurons in culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., & Sigworth, F. J. (1981) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00656997 · Cited by 18,436
Edwards, F. A., Konnerth, A., & Sakmann, B. (1990) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018289 · Cited by 535 · cited 1×
“…proposed to account for the twocomponent decay of nicotinic EPSCs on parasympathetic neurons (Rang, 198 l), developing neuromuscular junctions (Sakmann and Brenner, 1978; Fischbach and Schuetze, 1980; Henderson and Brehm, 1989), and GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (Edwards et al., 1990).”
Background
Cited by
Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels: Structure, Regulation, and Function
Traynelis, S. F., Wollmuth, L. P., McBain, C. J., Menniti, F. S., Vance, K. M., Ogden, K. K., Hansen, K. B., Yuan, H., Myers, S. J., & Dingledine, R. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.109.002451 · Cited by 3,568
The Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels
Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D., & Traynelis, S. F. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01394-2 · Cited by 3,554
Monyer, H., Burnashev, N., Laurie, D. J., Sakmann, B., & Seeburg, P. H. (1994) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(94)90210-0 · Cited by 3,535
Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes
Monyer, H., Sprengel, R., Schoepfer, R., Herb, A., Higuchi, M., Lomeli, H., Burnashev, N., Sakmann, B., & Seeburg, P. H. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5060.1217 · Cited by 2,541
Stargazin regulates synaptic targeting of AMPA receptors by two distinct mechanisms
Chen, L., Chetkovich, D. M., Petralia, R. S., Sweeney, N. T., Kawasaki, Y., Wenthold, R. J., Bredt, D. S., & Nicoll, R. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35050030 · Cited by 1,111
Metadata
- Authors
- Lester, R., & Jahr, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1992-02-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 635-643
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2128156437
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NMDA channel behavior depends on agonist affinity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.12-02-00635.1992
- The paper
- Lester, R., & Jahr, C. (1992). NMDA channel behavior depends on agonist affinity. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.12-02-00635.1992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.