Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colocalization of NGF binding sites, trk mRNA, and low-affinity NGF receptor mRNA in primary sensory neurons: responses to injury and infusion of NGF

Open access
Verge, VM, Merlio, JP, Grondin, J, Ernfors, P, Persson, H, Riopelle, RJ, Hokfelt, T, Richardson, PM·1992·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The distributions of mRNAs for the protooncogene trk and the low- affinity NGF receptor (LNGFR) were studied by hybridization with oligonucleotide probes on sections of adult rat primary sensory and sympathetic ganglia. For comparison with high-affinity binding sites, adjacent sections were processed for NGF receptor radioautography. Among neurons in lumbar dorsal root ganglia and trigeminal ganglia, trk mRNA and NGF-binding sites were closely colocalized; this finding together with previous direct evidence in other cell types is taken to indicate that trk protein is an essential component of the high- affinity NGF receptor in adult sensory neurons. In lumbar dorsal root ganglia and trigeminal ganglia, abundant LNGFR mRNA was found in all neurons with strong 125I-NGF labeling and on additional neurons lacking high-affinity NGF-binding sites. The presence of abundant LNGFR in neurons with high-affinity receptors could be the cause and/or consequence of their ability to respond to NGF. Neurons with abundant LNGFR mRNA but few high-affinity NGF-binding sites may have receptors for other members of the neurotrophin family. In nodose ganglia, neurons with high concentrations of LNGFR mRNA greatly outnumbered the small percentage with abundant trk mRNA. Following intrathecal infusion of NGF to otherwise normal dorsal root ganglia, the concentrations of LNGFR mRNA but not those of trk mRNA and NGF-binding sites were increased in NGF-responsive neurons. The usual single normal pattern of frequency histograms of LNGFR labeling indices became bimodal in response to NGF. Concentrations of NGF-binding sites, LNGFR mRNA, and trk mRNA were all decreased by peripheral nerve transection and restored by exogenous NGF, the restoration being complete for LNGFR mRNA and partial for trk mRNA and NGF-binding sites. The data indicate that NGF can regulate both LNGFR and trk mRNAs but do not clarify the possible contribution of the LNGFR protein to high-affinity binding sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.12-10-04011.1992

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Verge, V., Merlio, J., Grondin, J., Ernfors, P., Persson, H., Riopelle, R., Hokfelt, T., & Richardson, P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1992-10-01
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
4011-4022
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1714355435
Cited by
341
References
3
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colocalization of NGF binding sites, trk mRNA, and low-affinity NGF receptor mRNA in primary sensory neurons: responses to injury and infusion of NGF. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.12-10-04011.1992
The paper
Verge, V., Merlio, J., Grondin, J., Ernfors, P., Persson, H., Riopelle, R., Hokfelt, T., & Richardson, P. (1992). Colocalization of NGF binding sites, trk mRNA, and low-affinity NGF receptor mRNA in primary sensory neurons: responses to injury and infusion of NGF. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.12-10-04011.1992

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.