The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective vulnerability of dentate hilar neurons following traumatic brain injury: a potential mechanistic link between head trauma and disorders of the hippocampus
Open accessAbstract
Despite intensive study, the neurobiological basis of epilepsy and persistent memory impairment following traumatic head injury remains unknown. Since abnormalities of the hippocampus are known to be associated with temporal lobe seizures and memory dysfunction, we investigated the effects of experimental traumatic brain injury on hippocampal structure and function in the rat. Using a model of fluid- percussion injury, we have discovered that neurons of the dentate hilus are vulnerable to a brief, unilateral impact to the extradural surface of the brain. One week after trauma, there was a dramatic reduction in hilar neurons ipsilateral to the impact, and a milder but significant decrease in neurons on the contralateral side as well. This neuronal loss was highly selective since adjacent dentate granule and pyramidal neurons appeared relatively unaffected. Immunocytochemistry showed that the hilar cell loss included a loss of somatostatin-immunoreactive neurons, and degeneration stains provided evidence that irreversible hilar injury occurred within 4 hr of impact. To assess the functional effects of the hilar damage, dentate granule cell field potentials were measured in response to perforant path stimulation. This revealed abnormal dentate granule cell hyperexcitability at 2.0 Hz stimulation in many of the injured animals. The presence of abnormal hyperexcitability correlated with the loss of hilar neurons. Thus, a momentary impact to the surface of the brain can cause selective, bilateral hippocampal injury with associated abnormalities in dentate gyrus physiology. Furthermore, the pattern of cell loss is similar to that observed in some patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282
Corsellis, J. A. N., Bruton, C. J., & Freeman-Browne, D. (1973) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700049588 · Cited by 836
Cited by
Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis
Yirmiya, R., & Goshen, I. (2011) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.015 · Cited by 1,483
The New Neurometabolic Cascade of Concussion
Giza, C. C., & Hovda, D. A. (2014) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000000505 · Cited by 1,353
Magarin˜os, A. M., & McEwen, B. S. (1995) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(95)00259-l · Cited by 863
Peripheral Infusion of IGF-I Selectively Induces Neurogenesis in the Adult Rat Hippocampus
Åberg, M. A. I., Åberg, N. D., Hedbäcker, H., Oscarsson, J., & Eriksson, P. S. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-08-02896.2000 · Cited by 852
Oliva, A. A., Jiang, M., Lam, T., Smith, K. L., & Swann, J. W. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-09-03354.2000 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowenstein, D., Thomas, M., Smith, D., & McIntosh, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4846-4853
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2145748909
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.