The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity of Newborn Auditory Cortex to the Temporal Structure of Sounds
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the rapidly developing building blocks of speech perception in infancy requires a close look at the auditory prerequisites for speech sound processing. Pioneering studies have demonstrated that hemispheric specializations for language processing are already present in early infancy. However, whether these computational asymmetries can be considered a function of linguistic attributes or a consequence of basic temporal signal properties is under debate. Several studies in adults link hemispheric specialization for certain aspects of speech perception to an asymmetry in cortical tuning and reveal that the auditory cortices are differentially sensitive to spectrotemporal features of speech. Applying concurrent electrophysiological (EEG) and hemodynamic (near-infrared spectroscopy) recording to newborn infants listening to temporally structured nonspeech signals, we provide evidence that newborns process nonlinguistic acoustic stimuli that share critical temporal features with language in a differential manner. The newborn brain preferentially processes temporal modulations especially relevant for phoneme perception. In line with multi-time-resolution conceptions, modulations on the time scale of phonemes elicit strong bilateral cortical responses. Our data furthermore suggest that responses to slow acoustic modulations are lateralized to the right hemisphere. That is, the newborn auditory cortex is sensitive to the temporal structure of the auditory input and shows an emerging tendency for functional asymmetry. Hence, our findings support the hypothesis that development of speech perception is linked to basic capacities in auditory processing. From birth, the brain is tuned to critical temporal properties of linguistic signals to facilitate one of the major needs of humans: to communicate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Self-citationEarly language acquisition: cracking the speech code
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1533 · Cited by 2,291
Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing
Friederici, A. D. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01839-8 · Cited by 2,231
Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dehaene, S., & Hertz-Pannier, L. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077066 · Cited by 1,113 · cited 3×
“Pioneering studies showed that forward versus backward speech elicited greater vascular signal changes in left temporal brain regions in newborns and 3 month olds (Dehaene-Lambertz et al., 2002; Pena et al., 2003).”
BackgroundResult
Cited by
Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story
Lerner, Y., Honey, C. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3684-10.2011 · Cited by 834
Syllabic discrimination in premature human infants prior to complete formation of cortical layers
Mahmoudzadeh, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Fournier, M., Kongolo, G., Goudjil, S., Dubois, J., Grebe, R., & Wallois, F. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1212220110 · Cited by 401
Speaker Gaze Increases Information Coupling between Infant and Adult Brains
Leong, V., Byrne, E., Clackson, K., Georgieva, S., Lam, S., & Wass, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1702493114 · Cited by 299
The Infancy of the Human Brain
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Spelke, E. S. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.026 · Cited by 264
Assessing fetal response to maternal speech using a noninvasive functional brain imaging technique
Jardri, R., Houfflin‐Debarge, V., Delion, P., Pruvo, J., Thomas, P., & Pins, D. (2012) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.11.002 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Telkemeyer, S., Rossi, S., Koch, S. P., Nierhaus, T., Steinbrink, J., Poeppel, D., Obrig, H., & Wartenburger, I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-11-25
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 14726-14733
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2075168808
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of Newborn Auditory Cortex to the Temporal Structure of Sounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.1246-09.2009
- The paper
- Telkemeyer, S., Rossi, S., Koch, S. P., Nierhaus, T., Steinbrink, J., Poeppel, D., Obrig, H., & Wartenburger, I. (2009). Sensitivity of Newborn Auditory Cortex to the Temporal Structure of Sounds. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1246-09.2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.