The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bilateral Speech Comprehension Reflects Differential Sensitivity to Spectral and Temporal Features
Open accessAbstract
Speech comprehension has been shown to be a strikingly bilateral process, but the differential contributions of the subfields of left and right auditory cortices have remained elusive. The hypothesis that left auditory areas engage predominantly in decoding fast temporal perturbations of a signal whereas the right areas are relatively more driven by changes of the frequency spectrum has not been directly tested in speech or music. This brain-imaging study independently manipulated the speech signal itself along the spectral and the temporal domain using noise-band vocoding. In a parametric design with five temporal and five spectral degradation levels in word comprehension, a functional distinction of the left and right auditory association cortices emerged: increases in the temporal detail of the signal were most effective in driving brain activation of the left anterolateral superior temporal sulcus (STS), whereas the right homolog areas exhibited stronger sensitivity to the variations in spectral detail. In accordance with behavioral measures of speech comprehension acquired in parallel, change of spectral detail exhibited a stronger coupling with the STS BOLD signal. The relative pattern of lateralization (quantified using lateralization quotients) proved reliable in a jack-knifed iterative reanalysis of the group functional magnetic resonance imaging model. This study supplies direct evidence to the often implied functional distinction of the two cerebral hemispheres in speech processing. Applying direct manipulations to the speech signal rather than to low-level surrogates, the results lend plausibility to the notion of complementary roles for the left and right superior temporal sulci in comprehending the speech signal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., & Gjedde, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5058.846 · Cited by 1,507
Obleser, J., Wise, R. J. S., Alex Dresner, M., & Scott, S. K. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4663-06.2007 · Cited by 354
Self-citationRepresentation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain
Giraud, A.-L., Lorenzi, C., Ashburner, J., Wable, J., Johnsrude, I., Frackowiak, R., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1588 · Cited by 353
On the lateralization of emotional prosody: an event-related functional MR investigation
Kotz, S. A., Meyer, M., Alter, K., Besson, M., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2003) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00532-1 · Cited by 300
Self-citationHemispheric roles in the perception of speech prosody
Gandour, J., Tong, Y., Wong, D., Talavage, T., Dzemidzic, M., Xu, Y., Li, X., & Lowe, M. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.004 · Cited by 273 · cited 2×
“It is particularly in agreement with the concept of spectral fine-tuning of the right auditory cortex and its importance in tracking and processing pitch contours in speech (Kotz et al., 2003; Gandour et al., 2004) or the specific role for pitch in tone languages (for review, see Zatorre and Gandour, 2008).”
Background
Cited by
Price, C. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062 · Cited by 2,159
Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review.
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006 · Cited by 809
Meyer, L. (2018) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13748 · Cited by 328
Distinct sensitivity to spectrotemporal modulation supports brain asymmetry for speech and melody
Albouy, P., Benjamin, L., Morillon, B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz3468 · Cited by 298
Sensory–motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally
Cogan, G. B., Thesen, T., Carlson, C., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., & Pesaran, B. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12935 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Obleser, J., Eisner, F., & Kotz, S. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-08-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 8116-8123
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1971608716
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bilateral Speech Comprehension Reflects Differential Sensitivity to Spectral and Temporal Features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.1290-08.2008
- The paper
- Obleser, J., Eisner, F., & Kotz, S. A. (2008). Bilateral Speech Comprehension Reflects Differential Sensitivity to Spectral and Temporal Features. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1290-08.2008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.