Cited by 273Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Sensory–motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally

Open access
Cogan, Gregory B., Thesen, Thomas, Carlson, Chad, Doyle, Werner, Devinsky, Orrin, Pesaran, Bijan·2014·Nature

Abstract

Historically, the study of speech processing has emphasized a strong link between auditory perceptual input and motor production output. A kind of 'parity' is essential, as both perception- and production-based representations must form a unified interface to facilitate access to higher-order language processes such as syntax and semantics, believed to be computed in the dominant, typically left hemisphere. Although various theories have been proposed to unite perception and production, the underlying neural mechanisms are unclear. Early models of speech and language processing proposed that perceptual processing occurred in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus (Wernicke's area) and motor production processes occurred in the left inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's area). Sensory activity was proposed to link to production activity through connecting fibre tracts, forming the left lateralized speech sensory-motor system. Although recent evidence indicates that speech perception occurs bilaterally, prevailing models maintain that the speech sensory-motor system is left lateralized and facilitates the transformation from sensory-based auditory representations to motor-based production representations. However, evidence for the lateralized computation of sensory-motor speech transformations is indirect and primarily comes from stroke patients that have speech repetition deficits (conduction aphasia) and studies using covert speech and haemodynamic functional imaging. Whether the speech sensory-motor system is lateralized, like higher-order language processes, or bilateral, like speech perception, is controversial. Here we use direct neural recordings in subjects performing sensory-motor tasks involving overt speech production to show that sensory-motor transformations occur bilaterally. We demonstrate that electrodes over bilateral inferior frontal, inferior parietal, superior temporal, premotor and somatosensory cortices exhibit robust sensory-motor neural responses during both perception and production in an overt word-repetition task. Using a non-word transformation task, we show that bilateral sensory-motor responses can perform transformations between speech-perception- and speech-production-based representations. These results establish a bilateral sublexical speech sensory-motor system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12935

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In previous multiparticipant studies in able speakers, participants had near-identical speech capacity.

    “By contrast, in previous multiparticipant studies in able speakers, participants had near-identical speech capacity106,108,136–138.”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [138]

    The Online Methods (Participants; page unavailable) describe 16 participants selected for cognitive and language abilities in the average range or above, supporting the description of a multiparticipant study of able speakers. That criterion does not establish that their speech capacities were near-identical. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Halle M Stevens KN Analysis by synthesis Proceedings of seminar on speech compression and processing D7 1959

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cogan, G. B., Thesen, T., Carlson, C., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., & Pesaran, B.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Pesaran, Bijan
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-01-15
Volume
507
Issue
7490
Pages
94-98
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2081020587
Cited by
273
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R03DC010475)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
speech perception, speech production, sensory-motor transformation, hemispheric lateralization, word repetition, inferior frontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, somatosensory cortex, auditory cortex, motor cortex, conduction aphasia
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hearing, Humans, Language, Functional Laterality, Male, Models, Neurological, Psychomotor Performance, Speech, Speech Perception, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review