The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord
Open accessAbstract
Microstimulation of the gray matter of the frog's spinal cord was used to elicit motor responses. Force responses were recorded with the frog's ankle clamped while EMG activity was monitored. The collections of force patterns elicited at different leg configurations were summarized as force fields. These force fields showed convergence to an equilibrium point. The equilibrium paths were calculated from the force fields with the leg clamped. These paths predicted free limb motion in 75% of trials. The force fields were separated into active and prestimulation resting responses. The active force field responses had a fixed position equilibrium. These active force fields were modulated in amplitude over time, although the balance and orientations of forces in the pattern remained fixed. The active fields grouped into a few classes. These included both convergent and parallel fields. The convergent force fields (CFFS) could be observed in deafferented preparations. Motoneuron (MN) activity underlying the force fields was marked using sulforhodamine. The marked activity covered several segments. Several simulations and MN stimulations show that topography, limb geometry, and random activation could not account for the results. It is likely that propriospinal interneurons distribute the activity that underlies the responses observed here. Experiments showed that CFFs that resemble those elicited by microstimulation also underlie natural behaviors. The full variety of fields revealed by microstimulation was larger than the repertoire elicited by cutaneous stimulation. It was concluded that fixed-pattern force fields elicited in the spinal cord may be viewed as movement primitives. These force fields could form building blocks for more complex behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Integrative Action of the Nervous System.
Sherrington, C. (1907) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-190734120-00021 · Cited by 4,136
Masino, T., & Grobstein, P. (1989) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00247931 · Cited by 92
Cited by
Computational principles of movement neuroscience
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81497 · Cited by 2,122
Complex Movements Evoked by Microstimulation of Precentral Cortex
Graziano, M. S. A., Taylor, C. S. R., & Moore, T. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00698-0 · Cited by 921
Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input
Courtine, G., Gerasimenko, Y., van den Brand, R., Yew, A., Musienko, P., Zhong, H., Song, B., Ao, Y., Ichiyama, R. M., Lavrov, I., et al. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2401 · Cited by 706
Combining modules for movement
Bizzi, E., Cheung, V. C. K., d'Avella, A., Saltiel, P., & Tresch, M. (2008) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.08.004 · Cited by 587
Self-citationNeuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement
Ting, L. H., & McKay, J. L. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.002 · Cited by 514
Metadata
- Authors
- Giszter, S., Mussa-Ivaldi, F., & Bizzi, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1993-02-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 467-491
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2127515439
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.13-02-00467.1993
- The paper
- Giszter, S., Mussa-Ivaldi, F., & Bizzi, E. (1993). Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.13-02-00467.1993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.