The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4
Open accessAbstract
Neural activity in area V4 was examined to assess (1) whether the effects of attentive selection for stimulus features could be based on the memory of the feature, (2) whether dynamically changing the feature selection would cause activity associated with the newly selected stimuli to pop out, and (3) whether intrusion of more than one stimulus into the receptive field would disrupt the feature-selective activity. Rhesus monkeys were trained on several variations of a conditional orientation discrimination task. A differential activation of area V4 neurons was observed in the conditional discrimination task based on the presence of a match or a nonmatch between the conditional cue (a particular color or luminance) and the color or luminance of the receptive field stimulus. The differential activation was unchanged when the cue was removed and the animal had to remember its color (or luminance) to perform the task. When the cued feature was switched from one alternative to another in the middle of a trial the differential activation of neurons reversed over the course of 150–300 msec. If the stimulus in the receptive field contained the newly selected feature, V4 neurons became activated without a concomitant change in the stimulus in classical receptive field. Across the topographic map of V4 the activity associated with the newly selected stimuli popped out, whereas the activity of deselected stimuli faded to the background levels of other background objects. Evidence of a suppressive input from stimuli outside the classical receptive field was clear in only 3 of 24 neurons examined. Intrusion into the classical receptive field by a second stimulus resulted in a diminished difference between matching and nonmatching conditions. These physiological data suggest a major role for attentional control in the parallel processing of simple feature-selective differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Normalization Model of Attention
Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002 · Cited by 1,457
Modeling visual attention via selective tuning
Tsotsos, J. K., Culhane, S. M., Kei Wai, W. Y., Lai, Y., Davis, N., & Nuflo, F. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(95)00025-9 · Cited by 1,143
Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003 · Cited by 950
Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.
Moore, T., & Zirnsak, M. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033400 · Cited by 471
Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4
Connor, C. E., Preddie, D. C., Gallant, J. L., & Van Essen, D. C. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-09-03201.1997 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Motter, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1994-04-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2190-2199
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1570604963
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.14-04-02190.1994
- The paper
- Motter, B. (1994). Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.14-04-02190.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.