The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4
Open accessAbstract
Neural activity in area V4 was examined to assess (1) whether the effects of attentive selection for stimulus features could be based on the memory of the feature, (2) whether dynamically changing the feature selection would cause activity associated with the newly selected stimuli to pop out, and (3) whether intrusion of more than one stimulus into the receptive field would disrupt the feature-selective activity. Rhesus monkeys were trained on several variations of a conditional orientation discrimination task. A differential activation of area V4 neurons was observed in the conditional discrimination task based on the presence of a match or a nonmatch between the conditional cue (a particular color or luminance) and the color or luminance of the receptive field stimulus. The differential activation was unchanged when the cue was removed and the animal had to remember its color (or luminance) to perform the task. When the cued feature was switched from one alternative to another in the middle of a trial the differential activation of neurons reversed over the course of 150–300 msec. If the stimulus in the receptive field contained the newly selected feature, V4 neurons became activated without a concomitant change in the stimulus in classical receptive field. Across the topographic map of V4 the activity associated with the newly selected stimuli popped out, whereas the activity of deselected stimuli faded to the background levels of other background objects. Evidence of a suppressive input from stimuli outside the classical receptive field was clear in only 3 of 24 neurons examined. Intrusion into the classical receptive field by a second stimulus resulted in a diminished difference between matching and nonmatching conditions. These physiological data suggest a major role for attentional control in the parallel processing of simple feature-selective differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Normalization Model of Attention
Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002 · Cited by 1,457
Modeling visual attention via selective tuning
Tsotsos, J. K., Culhane, S. M., Kei Wai, W. Y., Lai, Y., Davis, N., & Nuflo, F. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(95)00025-9 · Cited by 1,143
Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003 · Cited by 950
Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.
Moore, T., & Zirnsak, M. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033400 · Cited by 471
Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4
Connor, C. E., Preddie, D. C., Gallant, J. L., & Van Essen, D. C. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-09-03201.1997 · Cited by 448
The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4
Yang, T., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4442-03.2004 · Cited by 427
The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory: a mini review
Lara, A. H., & Wallis, J. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00173 · Cited by 402
Effects of Spatial Attention on Contrast Response Functions in Macaque Area V4
Williford, T., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01207.2005 · Cited by 353
A neuronal model of attentional spotlight: Parietal guiding the temporal
Vidyasagar, T. R. (1999) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00005-3 · Cited by 296
Effects of Attention on the Reliability of Individual Neurons in Monkey Visual Cortex
McAdams, C. J., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)80034-9 · Cited by 286
The implementation of visual routines
Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., & Spekreijse, H. (2000) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00004-3 · Cited by 162
Temporal gating of neural signals during performance of a visual discrimination task
Seidemann, E., Zohary, E., & Newsome, W. T. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27906 · Cited by 103
Determinants and mechanisms of attentional modulation of neural processing.
Schroeder, C. (2001) · Frontiers in bioscience · doi:10.2741/schroed · Cited by 87
Neuronal activity in the visual cortex reveals the temporal order of cognitive operations
Moro, S. I., Tolboom, M., Khayat, P. S., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1256-10.2010 · Cited by 35
Attentional Recruitment of Inter-Areal Recurrent Networks for Selective Gain Control
Hahnloser, R. H. R., Douglas, R. J., & Hepp, K. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/08997660260028665 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Motter, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1994-04-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2190-2199
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1570604963
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.