Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coactivation of prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex in working memory tasks revealed by 2DG functional mapping in the rhesus monkey

Open access
Friedman, HR, Goldman-Rakic, PS·1994·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Functional studies of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the inferior parietal lobe of the rhesus monkey have implicated the former in spatial mnemonic function and the latter in visuospatial processing. We used the 14C-2-deoxyglucose (2DG) method to assess the contribution of these cortical regions to the cognitive performance of monkeys on working memory tasks. In these experiments, one group of monkeys (WORK) was trained to perform tasks (delayed spatial alternation, spatial delayed response, or delayed object alternation) that specifically engaged working memory processing. Local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) rates in the WORK group was compared with LCGU rates for a second group of monkeys (CONT) tested on one of two tasks (visual pattern discrimination or sensory-motor) that relied upon associative memory. The results showed that in comparison to the CONT group, working memory performance significantly enhanced LCGU by 19% in the principal sulcus region of prefrontal cortex and by 11–20% in regions of the inferior parietal cortex corresponding to areas 7A, 7B, 7IP, and 7M. By contrast, LCGU in the auditory cortex was similar for both groups. In all areas examined, metabolic activation peaked in lower layer III where the majority of associational and callosal neurons lie. Correlation analyses of LCGU and behavioral task parameters indicated that LCGU in the parietal subdivisions was significantly related either to the accuracy of performance or to the number of trials completed on the 2DG test. In contrast, LCGU in the principal sulcus was positively correlated with task difficulty. These findings suggest that the enhancement of LCGU in the principal sulcus was primarily influenced by the mnemonic components of the tasks whereas LCGU in the inferior parietal cortex was influenced by their sensory-motor demands. These are the first results showing concurrent metabolic activation of the prefrontal and parietal cortex in monkeys performing working memory tasks and they support the suggestion that these cortical regions represent two important nodes in a neural network mediating spatial working memory in the monkey (Goldman-Rakic, 1988). Further, the present report reinforces the power of the 2DG method for functional mapping as these areal and laminar results could not be readily appreciated at this resolution in any other methodological context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.14-05-02775.1994

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Friedman, H., & Goldman-Rakic, P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1994-05-01
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
2775-2788
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1918304343
Cited by
314
References
72
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coactivation of prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex in working memory tasks revealed by 2DG functional mapping in the rhesus monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.14-05-02775.1994
The paper
Friedman, H., & Goldman-Rakic, P. (1994). Coactivation of prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex in working memory tasks revealed by 2DG functional mapping in the rhesus monkey. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.14-05-02775.1994

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.