The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Axotomy results in delayed death and apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in adult rats
Open accessAbstract
Using quantitative anatomical techniques, we show that after intraorbital optic nerve transection in adult rats, virtually all retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) survive for 5 d and then die abruptly in large numbers, reducing the RGC population to approximately 50% of normal by day 7 and to less than 10% on day 14. During this period of rapid cell loss, some RGCs show cytochemical alterations indicative of apoptosis (“programmed cell death”), a change not previously categorized after axotomy in adult mammals. With intracranial lesions 8– 9 mm from the eye, the onset of cell death is delayed until day 8 and is greater with cut than crush. The demonstration that axotomy results in apoptosis, the long interval between axonal injury and RGC death, and the different time of onset of the massive RGC loss with optic nerve lesions near or far from the eye suggest that axonal interruption triggers a cascade of molecular events whose outcome may be critically dependent on the availability of neuronal trophic support from endogenous or exogenous sources. The role of such molecules in RGC survival and the reversible nature of these injury-induced changes is underscored by the temporary rescue of most RGCs by a single intravitreal injection of brain-derived neurotrophic factor during the first 5 d after intraorbital optic nerve injury (Mansour-Robaey et al., 1994). The delayed pattern of RGC loss observed in the present experiments likely explains such a critical period for effective neurotrophin administration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Repertoires of Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Ocular Diseases
Li, Y.-J., Jiang, Q., Cao, G.-F., Yao, J., & Yan, B. (2015) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000373980 · Cited by 16,304
Loss of the ClC-7 Chloride Channel Leads to Osteopetrosis in Mice and Man
Kornak, U., Kasper, D., Bösl, M. R., Kaiser, E., Schweizer, M., Schulz, A., Friedrich, W., Delling, G., & Jentsch, T. J. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00206-9 · Cited by 995
Meyer-Franke, A., Kaplan, M. R., Pfieger, F. W., & Barres, B. A. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90172-8 · Cited by 848
Lens Injury Stimulates Axon Regeneration in the Mature Rat Optic Nerve
Leon, S., Yin, Y., Nguyen, J., Irwin, N., & Benowitz, L. I. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-12-04615.2000 · Cited by 606
Nadal-Nicola´s, F. M., Jime´nez-Lo´pez, M., Sobrado-Calvo, P., Nieto-Lo´pez, L., Ca´novas-Marti´nez, I., Salinas-Navarro, M., Vidal-Sanz, M., & Agudo, M. (2009) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3267 · Cited by 541
Metadata
- Authors
- Berkelaar, M., Clarke, D., Wang, Y., Bray, G., & Aguayo, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1994-07-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4368-4374
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1906407967
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Axotomy results in delayed death and apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in adult rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.14-07-04368.1994
- The paper
- Berkelaar, M., Clarke, D., Wang, Y., Bray, G., & Aguayo, A. (1994). Axotomy results in delayed death and apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in adult rats. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.14-07-04368.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.