The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellular and molecular characterization of Ca2+ currents in acutely isolated, adult rat neostriatal neurons
Open accessAbstract
Ca2+ currents in acutely isolated, adult rat neostriatal neurons were studied with whole-cell voltage-clamp techniques. In the vast majority of neurons (approximately 90%, n > 250), currents were exclusively of the high-voltage-activated (HVA) type. HVA currents activated near -40 mV and reached their maximum amplitude near 0 mV. Quasi-steady-state inactivation curves in many neurons were well fitted only with a sum of Boltzmann functions, suggesting that the HVA currents were heterogeneous. Although the block of whole-cell current by Cd2+ was well fitted with a single isotherm having an IC50 of near 1 microM, experiments with organic channel antagonists suggested that at least four types of HVA channels were expressed by most cells. On average, the L-channel antagonist nifedipine (5–10 microM) blocked 31 +/- 10% of the whole-cell current (n = 20), the N-channel antagonist omega- conotoxin GVIA (omega-CgTx) (2–5 microM) blocked 27 +/- 11% (n = 20), and the P-channel antagonist omega-agatoxin IVA (100–500 nM) blocked 21 +/- 10% (n = 18). In many neurons, the block by omega-CgTx was partially or completely reversible. In cells tested with a combination of these antagonists, 34 +/- 17% of the peak Ca2+ current remained unblocked (n = 13). Single-cell expression profiling of medium-sized neurons revealed the presence of rbA and rbB Ca2+ channel alpha 1 subunit mRNAs but low or undetectable levels of rbC mRNA (n = 12). These findings suggest that although adult neostriatal projection neurons do not express significant levels of LVA Ca2+ current, they do express a pharmacologically and structurally heterogeneous population of HVA currents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Llinás, R. R. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3059497 · Cited by 2,285
Cited by
Dopaminergic modulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens
Nicola, S. M., Surmeier, D. J., & Malenka, R. C. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.185 · Cited by 931
Self-citationCoordinated Expression of Dopamine Receptors in Neostriatal Medium Spiny Neurons
Surmeier, D. J., Song, W.-J., & Yan, Z. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-20-06579.1996 · Cited by 747
Self-citationHernández-López, S., Tkatch, T., Perez-Garci, E., Galarraga, E., Bargas, J., Hamm, H., & Surmeier, D. J. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-24-08987.2000 · Cited by 443
Self-citationDopamine and N-Methyl-D- Aspartate Receptor Interactions in the Neostriatum
Cepeda, C., & Levine, M. S. (1998) · Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1159/000017294 · Cited by 351
State-Dependent Calcium Signaling in Dendritic Spines of Striatal Medium Spiny Neurons
Carter, A. G., & Sabatini, B. L. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.013 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Bargas, J., Howe, A., Eberwine, J., Cao, Y., & Surmeier, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6667-6686
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1486039058
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular and molecular characterization of Ca2+ currents in acutely isolated, adult rat neostriatal neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.14-11-06667.1994
- The paper
- Bargas, J., Howe, A., Eberwine, J., Cao, Y., & Surmeier, D. (1994). Cellular and molecular characterization of Ca2+ currents in acutely isolated, adult rat neostriatal neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.14-11-06667.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.