The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of zebra finches
Open accessAbstract
The stereotyped delivery of sequences of vocalizations by singing zebra finches is thought to be mediated by a “central motor program.” We hypothesized that electrically stimulating, and thus perturbing, the neural components of this motor program during singing should alter the subsequent singing pattern. In contrast, perturbing the activity of other neurons in the song motor pathway that do not participate directly in generating the song temporal pattern should not affect the singing pattern. We found that unilaterally stimulating the forebrain area RA of singing birds with chronically implanted electrodes distorted ongoing syllables without changing the order or timing of ensuing syllables. However, stimulating forebrain area HVc, which projects directly to RA, altered both ongoing syllables and the ensuing song pattern. These findings indicate that syllable sequencing during singing is organized in forebrain areas above RA (including HVc) and that the resulting pattern is imposed on lower structures of the motor pathway. Furthermore, the observation that unilateral forebrain perturbation was sufficient to alter the pattern of this bilaterally organized behavior suggests that (non-auditory) feedback pathways to the forebrain exist to coordinate the two hemispheres during singing. We suggest that the study of the motor control system for birdsong has provided the most direct evidence to date for localizing the programming of a skilled motor sequence to the telencephalon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of peripheral feedback in the control of movement
Marsden, C. D., Rothwell, J. C., & Day, B. L. (1984) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(84)80218-0 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms
Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 · Cited by 1,633
A Hierarchy of Time-Scales and the Brain
Kiebel, S. J., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000209 · Cited by 694
S., N., W., S., & S., P. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-002-0361-3 · Cited by 481
Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning
Dave, A. S., & Margoliash, D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5492.812 · Cited by 458
Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour
Brainard, M. S., & Doupe, A. J. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35036205 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Vu, E., Mazurek, M., & Kuo, Y.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6924-6934
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1846027912
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.