A Common Optimization Principle for Motor Execution in Healthy Subjects and Parkinsonian Patients
Open accessAbstract
Recent research on Parkinson's disease (PD) has emphasized that parkinsonian movement, although bradykinetic, shares many attributes with healthy behavior. This observation led to the suggestion that bradykinesia in PD could be due to a reduction in motor motivation. This hypothesis can be tested in the framework of optimal control theory, which accounts for many characteristics of healthy human movement while providing a link between the motor behavior and a cost/benefit trade-off. This approach offers the opportunity to interpret movement deficits of PD patients in the light of a computational theory of normal motor control. We studied 14 PD patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation and 16 age-matched healthy controls, and tested whether reaching movements were governed by similar rules in these two groups. A single optimal control model accounted for the reaching movements of healthy subjects and PD patients, whatever the condition of STN stimulation (on or off). The choice of movement speed was explained in all subjects by the existence of a preset dynamic range for the motor signals. This range was idiosyncratic and applied to all movements regardless of their amplitude. In PD patients this dynamic range was abnormally narrow and correlated with bradykinesia. STN stimulation reduced bradykinesia and widened this range in all patients, but did not restore it to a normal value. These results, consistent with the motor motivation hypothesis, suggest that constrained optimization of motor effort is the main determinant of movement planning (choice of speed) and movement production, in both healthy and PD subjects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Abnormal cerebellum and basal ganglia related to tremor and akinetic-rigid symptoms lead to longer RT or MT in PD patients.
“The abnormal cerebellum and basal ganglia that related to tremor [14, 22, 43, 44] and akinetic-rigid symptoms [6–9, 42] also lead to the longer RT or MT in PD patients.”
From Evaluation of tremor interference with control of voluntary reaching movements in patients with Parkinson's disease (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Prolonged RT and MT are also observed in PD patients with bradykinesia and rigidity.
“Prolonged RT and MT were also observed in the PD patients with other symptoms (i.e. bradykinesia and rigidity) [6].”
From Evaluation of tremor interference with control of voluntary reaching movements in patients with Parkinson's disease (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Prolonged RT and MT in PD patients with bradykinesia and rigidity have been attributed to rigidity due to abnormal basal ganglia system.
“These studies attributed the prolonged RT and MT in this kind of PD patients to the rigidity due to abnormal basal ganglia system [2, 6–9, 42].”
From Evaluation of tremor interference with control of voluntary reaching movements in patients with Parkinson's disease (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination
Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn963 · Cited by 3,081 · see citing works
Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning
Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29528 · Cited by 2,498 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning from Action: Reconsidering Movement Signaling in Midbrain Dopamine Neuron Activity
Coddington, L. T., & Dudman, J. T. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.036 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Hu, Z., Hao, M., Xu, S., Xiao, Q., & Lan, N. (2019) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-019-0505-0 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baraduc, P., Thobois, S., Gan, J., Broussolle, E., & Desmurget, M.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université de Lyon (FR)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-01-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 665-677
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6704928
- OpenAlex
- W2069060695
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, bradykinesia, optimal control, motor design optimization, subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation, reaching movements, cost-benefit trade-off, motor planning
- MeSH terms
- Acceleration, Aged, Algorithms, Antiparkinson Agents, Biomechanical Phenomena, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Individuality, Isotonic Contraction, Levodopa, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Motor Skills, Reaction Time, Hypokinesia, Parkinsonian Disorders, Deep Brain Stimulation, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review