The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
I Heard That Coming: Event-Related Potential Evidence for Stimulus-Driven Prediction in the Auditory System
Open accessAbstract
The auditory system has been shown to detect predictability in a tone sequence, but does it use the extracted regularities for actually predicting the continuation of the sequence? The present study sought to find evidence for the generation of such predictions. Predictability was manipulated in an isochronous series of tones in which every other tone was a repetition of its predecessor. The existence of predictions was probed by occasionally omitting either the first (unpredictable) or the second (predictable) tone of a same-frequency tone pair. Event-related electrical brain activity elicited by the omission of an unpredictable tone differed from the response to the actual tone right from the tone onset. In contrast, early electrical brain activity elicited by the omission of a predictable tone was quite similar to the response to the actual tone. This suggests that the auditory system preactivates the neural circuits for expected input, using sequential predictions to specifically prepare for future acoustic events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Perhaps the most compelling example of the putative prediction error signal is the robust neural response elicited by the omission of an expected stimulus 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 (see Ref. 42 for a review).”
From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation
Jasper, H. H. (1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · Cited by 6,567
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,946
A theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound
Bregman, A. S., & McAdams, S. E. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.408434 · Cited by 3,092
Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted
Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(78)90006-9 · Cited by 2,725
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 · Cited by 2,644
Klem, G. H., Lüders, H. O., Jasper, H. H., & Elger, C. E. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 2,361
Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds
Warren, R. M. (1970) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.167.3917.392 · Cited by 1,168
The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions
Bar, M. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005 · Cited by 1,144
The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience.
Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.826 · Cited by 1,069
Self-citationGregory, R. L. (1980) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1980.0090 · Cited by 789
Newborn infants detect the beat in music
Winkler, I., Háden, G. P., Ladinig, O., Sziller, I., & Honing, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809035106 · Cited by 647
Self-citationThe Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech
Miller, G. A., & Licklider, J. C. R. (1950) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906584 · Cited by 635
Interpreting the Mismatch Negativity
Winkler, I. (2007) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.21.34.147 · Cited by 596
Self-citationPrediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework
Schubotz, R. I. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.006 · Cited by 559
Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M. H., & Schröger, E. (2006) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.001 · Cited by 531
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound
Smoliar, S. W., & Bregman, A. S. (1991) · Computer Music Journal · doi:10.2307/3680919 · Cited by 511
Winkler, I., Karmos, G., & Näätänen, R. (1996) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(96)01008-6 · Cited by 350
Self-citationTemporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission.
Yabe, H., Tervaniemi, M., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1997) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199705260-00035 · Cited by 313 · cited 4×
“…stimulus paradigm and analyses were not optimized toward testing the omission-related MMN, and that the predictability effect was found substantially earlier than the expected latency range of the omission-related MMN [100 –150 ms from the onset of the expected tone (cf. Yabe et al., 1997, 1998)].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEvent-Related Brain Potential Correlates of Human Auditory Sensory Memory-Trace Formation
Haenschel, C., Vernon, D. J., Dwivedi, P., Gruzelier, J. H., & Baldeweg, T. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1227-05.2005 · Cited by 310
Sound of silence activates auditory cortex
Kraemer, D. J. M., Macrae, C. N., Green, A. E., & Kelley, W. M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/434158a · Cited by 278
Repetition effects to sounds: evidence for predictive coding in the auditory system
Baldeweg, T. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.010 · Cited by 233
Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain.
Yabe, H., Tervaniemi, M., Sinkkonen, J., Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätänen, R. (1998) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577298000183 · Cited by 216
Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality
Sussman, E. S., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2003) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196525 · Cited by 216
Self-citationYvert, B. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.5.411 · Cited by 204
Tervaniemi, M. H., Saarinen, J. K. S., Paavilainen, P., Danilova, N. N., & Näätänen, R. (1994) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(94)90036-1 · Cited by 164
The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams
Denham, S. L., & Winkler, I. (2006) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.012 · Cited by 158
Self-citationDynamic sensory updating in the auditory system
Sussman, E. S., & Winkler, I. (2001) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00067-2 · Cited by 145
Self-citationSchröger, E. (2007) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.21.34.138 · Cited by 132
Yabe, H., Winkler, I., Czigler, I., Koyama, S., Kakigi, R., Sutoh, T., Hiruma, T., & Kaneko, S. (2001) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02224-7 · Cited by 124
Self-citationPreattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features
Paavilainen, P., Arajärvi, P., & Takegata, R. (2007) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e328010e2ac · Cited by 113
Encoding of Illusory Continuity in Primary Auditory Cortex
Petkov, C. I., O’Connor, K. N., & Sutter, M. L. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.031 · Cited by 112
Ladinig, O., Honing, H., Háden, G., & Winkler, I. (2009) · Music Perception · doi:10.1525/mp.2009.26.4.377 · Cited by 111 · cited 2×
“Difference amplitudes were additionally influenced by the electrode factor (F(2,26) 3.432, p 0.05, 2 0.209) (due to more negative amplitudes at Fz than at F3, p 0.05), but no interaction of condition with electrode was obtained (F(4,52) 0.645, p 0.633).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationAttenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40‐Hz response to self‐initiated sounds
Baess, P., Widmann, A., Roye, A., Schröger, E., & Jacobsen, T. (2009) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06683.x · Cited by 110
Neural correlates of rhythmic expectancy
Zanto, T. P., Snyder, J. S., & Large, E. W. (2006) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0057-5 · Cited by 91
Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies
Bendixen, A., Prinz, W., Horváth, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Schröger, E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.040 · Cited by 88
Self-citationPrinz, W. (2006) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70389-7 · Cited by 87
Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events
Ritter, W., Sussman, E. S., Deacon, D., Cowan, N., & Vaughan, H. G. (1999) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3660835 · Cited by 80
Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound
Winkler, I., Takegata, R., & Sussman, E. S. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.06.005 · Cited by 73
Self-citationBinding Symbols and Sounds: Evidence from Event-Related Oscillatory Gamma-Band Activity
Widmann, A., Gruber, T., Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M. H., & Schröger, E. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl178 · Cited by 58
Grimm, S., & Schröger, E. (2007) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2007-253406 · Cited by 55
Spectrotemporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain
Shinozaki, N., Yabe, H., Sato, Y., Hiruma, T., Sutoh, T., Matsuoka, T., & Kaneko, S. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00170-8 · Cited by 47
Dubnov, S. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2007.912378 · Cited by 27
Information and Resource Allocation
Sinkkonen, J. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665516.017 · Cited by 18
Dynamic sound stream formation based on continuity of spectral change
Masuda-Katsuse, I., & Kawahara, H. (1999) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(98)00084-3 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions
Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003 · Cited by 1,114
The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances
Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A. A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., Dahlström, Ö., Signoret, C., Stenfelt, S. P. Y., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031 · Cited by 1,056
Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex
Wacongne, C., Labyt, E., van Wassenhove, V., Bekinschtein, T., Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1117807108 · Cited by 560
Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects
Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003 · Cited by 574
Self-citationThe what, where and how of auditory-object perception
Bizley, J. K., & Cohen, Y. E. (2013) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3565 · Cited by 479
Metadata
- Authors
- Bendixen, A., Schroger, E., & Winkler, I.
- Affiliations
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HU)
- University of Szeged (HU)
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 8447-8451
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6665649
- OpenAlex
- W1980632783
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (231168)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHR 375/20-1, SCHR 375/20, 375/20-1)
- Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- auditory prediction, predictability, tone sequences, event-related potentials, auditory regularity
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Pathways, Auditory Perception, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Hearing, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychoacoustics, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
