The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Migratory paths of neurons and glia in the embryonic chick spinal cord
Open accessAbstract
To study the migration of chick spinal cord neurons, we labeled individual cells in the ventricular zone with recombinant retroviruses, then identified their progeny histochemically. First, we analyzed cell mixing in the ventricular zone. Some clones labeled at early neural tube stages spread widely along both the dorsoventral and rostrocaudal axes. However, clones labeled later were confined to narrow domains along both axes. These results imply that displacement of cells within the ventricular zone becomes progressively restricted. Second, we studied the migration of cells out of the ventricular zone by infecting embryos at a fixed stage and varying the time of analysis. At first, most clones consisted of radial arrays of cells, suggesting that the initial migration is predominantly radial. In many clones, however, neurons turned orthogonally from parental radial arrays and migrated along the path of circumferentially oriented axons. By hatching, clonally related cells in the gray matter were usually distributed in narrow transverse slabs, but some white matter glial cells had migrated longitudinally for up to several segments. We conclude that the dispersal of clonally related cells results from (1) early mixing of progenitors within the neural tube; (2) radial stacking of progeny in the ventricular zone; (3) migration of progeny from the ventricular zone in spoke-like routes; (4) circumferential migration of some neurons along axons; (5) short-distance dispersal of differentiating neurons; and (6) a late, longitudinal migration of glia through white matter tracts. Finally, we show that floor plate cells differ from other spinal cord cells in both their
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The cell biology of neurogenesis
Götz, M., & Huttner, W. B. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1739 · Cited by 2,130
Takebayashi, H., Nabeshima, Y., Yoshida, S., Chisaka, O., Ikenaka, K., & Nabeshima, Y.-I. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00926-0 · Cited by 494
Defective oligodendrocyte development and severe hypomyelination in PDGF-A knockout mice
Fruttiger, M., Karlsson, L., Hall, A. C., Abramsson, A., Calver, A. R., Boström, H., Willetts, K., Bertold, C.-H., Heath, J. K., Betsholtz, C., et al. (1999) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.126.3.457 · Cited by 441
A Sonic Hedgehog–Independent, Retinoid-Activated Pathway of Neurogenesis in the Ventral Spinal Cord
Pierani, A., Brenner-Morton, S., Chiang, C., & Jessell, T. M. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80802-8 · Cited by 363
Sonic hedgehog signaling is required during the appearance of spinal cord oligodendrocyte precursors
Orentas, D. M., Hayes, J. E., Dyer, K. L., & Miller, R. H. (1999) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.126.11.2419 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Leber, S., & Sanes, Jr.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1236-1248
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1504807885
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Migratory paths of neurons and glia in the embryonic chick spinal cord. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.15-02-01236.1995
- The paper
- Leber, S., & Sanes, Jr. (1995). Migratory paths of neurons and glia in the embryonic chick spinal cord. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.15-02-01236.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.