The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential influence of nerve growth factor on neuropeptide expression in vivo: a novel role in peptide suppression in adult sensory neurons
Open accessAbstract
In this study the actions of NGF in regulating peptide expression were examined in vivo in adult rat primary sensory neurons. The hypothesis that NGF might tonically inhibit expression of some peptides was tested specifically. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were used to detect presence or absence of alpha-CGRP, beta-CGRP, SP, SOM, VIP, CCK, NPY, and GAL as well as their mRNAs. In neurons in normal lumbar DRG alpha-CGRP, beta-CGRP, SP, and SOM are abundantly and heterogeneously expressed whereas few neurons have detectable VIP, CCK, NPY, or GAL. Two weeks following sciatic nerve transection, concentrations of alpha-CGRP, beta-CGRP, SP, and SOM plus their mRNAs have decreased to background in all but a few neurons. In contrast, VIP, CCK, NPY, and GAL are now synthesized in many neurons. Delayed intrathecal infusion of NGF (125 ng/microliter/hr) for 7 d, starting 2 weeks after injury counteracted the decrease in expression of alpha- CGRP, beta-CGRP and SP expression, but not SOM. This lack of influence of NGF on SOM is consistent with the absence of high-affinity NGF receptors and trk mRNA in SOM-positive neurons. Delayed infusion of NGF also reduced the number of neurons expressing VIP, CCK, NPY, and GAL after injury by approximately one-half in each subpopulation. Therefore, we suggest that NGF suppresses expression of these four peptides but only if the neurons also have NGF receptors. The results show that NGF can regulate peptide expression differentially and may also be part of the signal that allows reversion to normal of responses to injury as axons regenerate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hohn, A., Leibrock, J., Bailey, K., & Barde, Y.-A. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/344339a0 · Cited by 1,145
Mice lacking brain-derived neurotrophic factor develop with sensory deficits
Ernfors, P., Lee, K.-F., & Jaenisch, R. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368147a0 · Cited by 1,067
Cited by
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Nerve Growth Factor Signaling, Neuroprotection, and Neural Repair
Sofroniew, M. V., Howe, C. L., & Mobley, W. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1217 · Cited by 1,284
The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration
Fu, S. Y., & Gordon, T. (1997) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740621 · Cited by 1,202
Neumann, S., Doubell, T. P., Leslie, T., & Woolf, C. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384360a0 · Cited by 585
Mediators of Chronic Pruritus in Atopic Dermatitis: Getting the Itch Out?
Mollanazar, N. K., Smith, P. K., & Yosipovitch, G. (2016) · Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · doi:10.1007/s12016-015-8488-5 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Verge, V., Richardson, P., Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z., & Hokfelt, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2081-2096
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1496712622
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential influence of nerve growth factor on neuropeptide expression in vivo: a novel role in peptide suppression in adult sensory neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.15-03-02081.1995
- The paper
- Verge, V., Richardson, P., Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z., & Hokfelt, T. (1995). Differential influence of nerve growth factor on neuropeptide expression in vivo: a novel role in peptide suppression in adult sensory neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.15-03-02081.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.