Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential influence of nerve growth factor on neuropeptide expression in vivo: a novel role in peptide suppression in adult sensory neurons

Open access
Verge, VM, Richardson, PM, Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z, Hokfelt, T·1995·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In this study the actions of NGF in regulating peptide expression were examined in vivo in adult rat primary sensory neurons. The hypothesis that NGF might tonically inhibit expression of some peptides was tested specifically. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were used to detect presence or absence of alpha-CGRP, beta-CGRP, SP, SOM, VIP, CCK, NPY, and GAL as well as their mRNAs. In neurons in normal lumbar DRG alpha-CGRP, beta-CGRP, SP, and SOM are abundantly and heterogeneously expressed whereas few neurons have detectable VIP, CCK, NPY, or GAL. Two weeks following sciatic nerve transection, concentrations of alpha-CGRP, beta-CGRP, SP, and SOM plus their mRNAs have decreased to background in all but a few neurons. In contrast, VIP, CCK, NPY, and GAL are now synthesized in many neurons. Delayed intrathecal infusion of NGF (125 ng/microliter/hr) for 7 d, starting 2 weeks after injury counteracted the decrease in expression of alpha- CGRP, beta-CGRP and SP expression, but not SOM. This lack of influence of NGF on SOM is consistent with the absence of high-affinity NGF receptors and trk mRNA in SOM-positive neurons. Delayed infusion of NGF also reduced the number of neurons expressing VIP, CCK, NPY, and GAL after injury by approximately one-half in each subpopulation. Therefore, we suggest that NGF suppresses expression of these four peptides but only if the neurons also have NGF receptors. The results show that NGF can regulate peptide expression differentially and may also be part of the signal that allows reversion to normal of responses to injury as axons regenerate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.15-03-02081.1995

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Verge, V., Richardson, P., Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z., & Hokfelt, T.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1995-03-01
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
2081-2096
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1496712622
Cited by
377
References
2
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential influence of nerve growth factor on neuropeptide expression in vivo: a novel role in peptide suppression in adult sensory neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.15-03-02081.1995
The paper
Verge, V., Richardson, P., Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z., & Hokfelt, T. (1995). Differential influence of nerve growth factor on neuropeptide expression in vivo: a novel role in peptide suppression in adult sensory neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.15-03-02081.1995

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.