Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NMDA receptor subunit mRNA expression by projection neurons and interneurons in rat striatum

Open access
Landwehrmeyer, GB, Standaert, DG, Testa, CM, Penney, JB, Young, AB·1995·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are enriched in the neostriatum and are thought to mediate several actions of glutamate including neuronal excitability, long-term synaptic plasticity, and excitotoxic injury. NMDA receptors are assembled from several subunits (NMDAR1, NMDAR2A-D) encoded by five genes; alternative splicing gives rise to eight isoforms of subunit NMDAR1. We studied the expression of NMDA receptor subunits in neurochemically identified striatal neurons of adult rats by in situ hybridization histochemistry using a double- labeling technique. Enkephalin-positive projection neurons, somatostatin-positive interneurons, and cholinergic interneurons each have distinct NMDA receptor subunit phenotypes. Both populations of striatal interneurons examined express lower levels of NMDAR1 and NMDAR2B subunit mRNA than enkephalin-positive neurons. The three striatal cell populations differ also in the presence of markers for alternatively spliced regions of NMDAR1, suggesting that interneurons preferentially express NMDAR1 splice forms lacking one (cholinergic neurons) or both (somatostatin-positive neurons) alternatively spliced carboxy-terminal regions. In addition, somatostatin- and cholinergic-, but not enkephalin-positive neurons express NMDAR2D mRNA. Thus, these striatal cell populations express different NMDAR-subunit mRNA phenotypes and therefore are likely to display NMDA channels with distinct pharmacological and physiological properties. Differences in NMDA receptor expression may contribute to the relative resistance of striatal interneurons to the neurotoxic effect of NMDA receptor agonists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.15-07-05297.1995

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Landwehrmeyer, G., Standaert, D., Testa, C., Penney, J., & Young, A.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
5297-5307
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1484597533
Cited by
317
References
3
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NMDA receptor subunit mRNA expression by projection neurons and interneurons in rat striatum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.15-07-05297.1995
The paper
Landwehrmeyer, G., Standaert, D., Testa, C., Penney, J., & Young, A. (1995). NMDA receptor subunit mRNA expression by projection neurons and interneurons in rat striatum. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.15-07-05297.1995

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.