The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rod photoreceptor neurite sprouting in retinitis pigmentosa
Open accessAbstract
In animal models for retinitis pigmentosa (RP), rod photoreceptors show abnormal distribution of rhodopsin prior to undergoing cell death. To elucidate the steps in degeneration of human photoreceptors, immunocytochemistry was performed on donor retinas from 15 RP patients and five normal subjects. Rhodopsin immunolabeling in the normal retinas was restricted to the rod outer segments. In the RP retinas, rhodopsin was present in shortened rod outer segments and in the surface membranes of the rod inner segments and somata. In regions of photoreceptor death, the surviving rods had sprouted rhodopsin-positive neurites that were closely associated with gliotic Muller cell processes and extended to the inner limiting membrane. Rods and cones in the RP maculas did not form neurites, but the axons of peripheral cones were abnormally elongated and branched. Double immunofluorescence labeling showed that the rod neurites bypassed the horizontal and rod bipolar cells that are normally postsynaptic to rod axons. To our knowledge, this is the first report of rod neurite sprouting in vivo. We were unable to find neurites on degenerate rods in old rds mice, an animal model for RP. The rod neurites in the human RP retinas resemble the long, branched processes formed by rods cultured on Muller cells or purified N-CAM. Neurite growth by surviving rods in the RP retinas may be a response to neurotrophic factor upregulation, loss of inhibitory factors, or changes in molecules associated with reactive Muller cells. Such changes in the retinal microenvironment may impede functional integration of transplanted photoreceptors. The contributions of the rhodopsin-positive rod neurites and abnormal cone axons to the functional abnormalities observed in RP are unknown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration
Marc, R. E., Jones, B. W., Watt, C. B., & Strettoi, E. (2003) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(03)00039-9 · Cited by 867
Photoreceptor degeneration: genetic and mechanistic dissection of a complex trait
Wright, A. F., Chakarova, C. F., Abd El-Aziz, M. M., & Bhattacharya, S. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2717 · Cited by 631
Retinal remodeling triggered by photoreceptor degenerations
Jones, B. W., Watt, C. B., Frederick, J. M., Baehr, W., Chen, C., Levine, E. M., Milam, A. H., Lavail, M. M., & Marc, R. E. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10703 · Cited by 476
Self-citationCuenca, N., Fernández-Sánchez, L., Campello, L., Maneu, V., De la Villa, P., Lax, P., & Pinilla, I. (2014) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.07.001 · Cited by 401
Lewis, G. P., & Fisher, S. K. (2003) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(03)30005-1 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Kljavin, I., & Milam, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5429-5438
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1915525585
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rod photoreceptor neurite sprouting in retinitis pigmentosa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.15-08-05429.1995
- The paper
- Li, Z., Kljavin, I., & Milam, A. (1995). Rod photoreceptor neurite sprouting in retinitis pigmentosa. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.15-08-05429.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.