Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The pharmacology of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: a dual-probe microdialysis study in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens of the rat brain

Open access
Westerink, BH, Kwint, HF, deVries, JB·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Receptor-specific compounds were applied by retrograde microdialysis to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the rat brain. The effect of the intrategmental infusions on extracellular dopamine in the ipsilateral nucleus accumbens were recorded with a second microdialysis probe. Intrategmental infusion of muscimol (10–40 microM) or baclofen (50 microM) decreased extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. Intrategmental infusion of NMDA (1 mM, 15 min) or kainate (50 microM, 15 min) increased extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. The effects of the excitatory amino acids were suppressed by co-infusion of MK-801 (1 MM), (+)-3-amino-1-hydroxy-2-pyrrolidone [(+)-HA966; 1 mM], (+/-)-3(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP; 100 microM), and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX;300 microM). Intrategmental infusion of of carbachol (50 microM) increased extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. These results provide evidence for localization of GABAA, GABAB NMDA, non-NMDA, and cholinergic receptors on dopamine neurons in the VTA. Infusions of CPP, (+)-MK-801, (+)-HA966, CNQX, mecamylamine, atropine, or 3-[[(3,4- dichlorophenyl)methyl]propyl](diethoxymethyl) phosphonic acid (CGP 52432) into the VTA did not modify extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. Infusion of bicuculline (50 microM) and (-)- sulpiride (50 microM) was followed by an increase in extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. These data suggest that dopamine neurons in the VTA are tonically inhibited by GABA and dopamine by acting on GABAA, and D2 receptors, respectively. A tonic stimulation by glutamatergic or cholinergic neurons was not detected. Finally, results on A10 neurons are compared with earlier data on A9 neurons. A striking difference was found in that GABAA-dopamine interactions are indirect in the substantia nigra and direct in the VTA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-08-02605.1996

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 370

Metadata

Authors
Westerink, B., Kwint, H., & deVries, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-04-15
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
2605-2611
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2150167216
Cited by
370
References
2
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pharmacology of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: a dual-probe microdialysis study in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens of the rat brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-08-02605.1996
The paper
Westerink, B., Kwint, H., & deVries, J. (1996). The pharmacology of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: a dual-probe microdialysis study in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens of the rat brain. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-08-02605.1996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.