The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal Representations of Odors in an Olfactory Network
Open accessAbstract
The responses of projection neurons in the antennal lobe of the locust brain (the functional analog of mitral–tufted cells in the vertebrate olfactory bulb) to natural blends and simple odors were studied with multiple intra- and extracellular recordings in vivo. Individual odors evoked complex temporal response patterns in many neurons. These patterns differed across odors for a given neuron and across neurons for a given odor, but were stable for each neuron over repeated presentations (separated by seconds to minutes) of the same odor. The response of individual neurons to an odor was superimposed on an odor-specific coherent oscillatory population activity. Each neuron usually participated in the coherent oscillations during one or more specific epochs of the ensemble activity. These epochs of phase locking were reliable for each neuron over tens of repeated presentations of one odor. The timing of these epochs of synchronization differed across neurons and odors. Correlated activity of specific pairs of neurons, hence, generally occurred transiently during the population response, at times that were specific to these pairs and to the odor smelled. The field potential oscillations, therefore, fail to reveal a progressive transformation of the synchronized ensemble as the response to the odor unfolds. We propose that (1) odors are represented by spatially and temporally distributed ensembles of coherently firing neurons, and (2) the field potential oscillations that characterize odor responses in the olfactory system occur, at least in this animal, in parallel with a slower dynamic odor representation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
Cited by
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
The neural basis of temporal processing
Mauk, M. D., & Buonomano, D. V. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144247 · Cited by 976
Replay and Time Compression of Recurring Spike Sequences in the Hippocampus
Nádasdy, Z., Hirase, H., Czurkó, A., Csicsvari, J., & Buzsáki, G. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-21-09497.1999 · Cited by 932
“…coordination of spike sequences, in relation to stimulus presentation, has been described in various invertebrate (Dayhoff and Gerstein, 1983; Laurent et al., 1996; Marder and Calabrese, 1996) and vertebrate (Strehler and Lestienne, 1986; Ts’o et al., 1986; Vaadia and Abeles, 1987; Eckhorn…”
BackgroundImpaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies
Stopfer, M., Bhagavan, S., Smith, B. H., & Laurent, G. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36335 · Cited by 927
Self-citationOlfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals
Laurent, G. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn964 · Cited by 732
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurent, G., Wehr, M., & Davidowitz, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1996-06-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3837-3847
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2168213284
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Representations of Odors in an Olfactory Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-12-03837.1996
- The paper
- Laurent, G., Wehr, M., & Davidowitz, H. (1996). Temporal Representations of Odors in an Olfactory Network. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-12-03837.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.